7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Book Chapter: not found
      Fokusgruppen in der empirischen Sozialwissenschaft 

      Fokusgruppen innerhalb eines between-method-Designs zur Bestimmung der Risikowahrnehmung von potenziellen Terroranschlägen

      other
      VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

      Read this book at

      Buy book Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Viewpoint: Terrorism and Dispelling the Myth of a Panic Prone Public

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            The research act

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Public information needs after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210 in London: cross sectional telephone survey and qualitative analysis.

              To identify public perceptions of the risk to health after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210 (210Po) in London and to assess the impact of public health communications. Cross sectional telephone survey and qualitative interviews. London, United Kingdom. 1000 people completed the cross sectional survey and 86 potentially exposed people completed the qualitative interviews. Perception of risk to personal health after the 210Po incident. Qualitative interviews were analysed with an emphasis on information needs. 11.7% of the survey sample (n=117) perceived their health to be at risk. Aside from personal variables the main predictors of perceived risk to health were believing that the incident was related to terrorism (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 4.6) rather than to espionage, that it was targeted at the wider public rather than one person (5.9, 3.2 to 10.9), and that it could affect people who had not been in the contaminated area (3.2, 2.1 to 5.1). Participants in the qualitative interviews were generally satisfied with the information they had received, although they would have preferred more information about their individual risk of exposure, the results of their urine tests, and the health implications of the incident. Perceptions of the public that the 210Po incident in London in 2006 was related to espionage helped to reassure them that the risks to personal health were low. In the event of future incidents it is important to ensure that detailed, comprehensible information about the risks of any exposure is available.
                Bookmark

                Author and book information

                Book Chapter
                2012
                : 134-147
                10.1007/978-3-531-19397-7_7
                30d6f970-d731-47f0-aadb-ac5280287d56
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book

                Book chapters

                Similar content2,887