22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Book Chapter: found
      Is Open Access
      The Pandemic of Argumentation 

      The UK Government’s “Balancing Act” in the Pandemic: Rational Decision-Making from an Argumentative Perspective

      other
      Springer International Publishing

      Read this book at

      Buy book Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this book yet. Authors can add summaries to their books on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This chapter looks at how the “balance” between lives, livelihoods and other concerns was talked about in four main newspapers in the UK, between March 2020 and March 2021, in assessing the UK government’s performance. Different arguments were made for opposite conclusions, favouring either strict and prolonged lockdowns or, on the contrary, a speedy exit from lockdown and a resumption of normal life. From the point of view of argumentation theory, the empirical data suggests that what is being balanced or weighed together in pro/con argumentation by two opposite parties are not as much the costs and benefits of one’s own proposal, but the costs of one proposal against the costs of its alternative (a “cost-cost” analysis). Rather than defending their own proposal by arguing that the benefits outweigh the costs, each side is criticizing the opponent’s proposal by claiming that the costs of their proposal are more unacceptable than the costs of their own. An implicit minimax strategy (minimize costs in a worst-case scenario) was applied in different ways, depending on how the consequences were assessed, and how this assessment changed over time. The debate over lockdown illustrated an interesting type of pro/con argument, typical to crisis situations, in which all the intended “benefits” were in fact avoided “costs”, and contrasted a medical/epidemiological perspective with a political perspective on the best course of action.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Choice is Not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Critical Rationalism. A Restatement and Defence

                Bookmark

                Author and book information

                Book Chapter
                2022
                February 25 2022
                : 225-246
                10.1007/978-3-030-91017-4_12
                a6c76f65-01ad-4cb4-b960-3876627d5936
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this book

                Book chapters

                Similar content24