[†]
A previous version of this paper was presented under the title ‘An ever-changing scope?
The expansive boundaries of EU public procurement rules, extraterritoriality and the
Court of Justice’ at the research workshop ‘Extraterritoriality of EU Law & Human
Rights after Lisbon: Scope and Boundaries’ held at the Sussex European Institute on
13–14 July 2017. The original version of the paper is available at
https://ssrn.com/abstract=3000256. I am grateful to all participants in that workshop for useful feedback and suggestion
on how to improve the paper, and in particular to Vassilis Tzevelekos, Samantha Velluti,
Kamala Dawar, Joanne Scott and Clair Gammage. I also benefitted from comments on that
first draft from Grith S Ølykke, and further discussions with Pedro Telles. The paper
has evolved significantly since that first draft and, in changing its orientation
and refining the international public law, comparative law and human rights aspects
of the discussion, I have immensely benefitted from the feedback I received from my
colleagues at the European, Human Rights and International Law primary unit of the
University of Bristol Law School after a presentation I gave on 20 November 2017,
and in particular from the generous insights and challenging questions of Tonia Novitz,
Sofia Galani, Shreya Atrey, Phil Syrpis, Alan Bogg, Steven Greer, Jule Mulder, Michael
Naughton, Tomaso Ferrando, Julian Rivers, Jonathan Hill, and Eirik Bjorge. I am also
indebted to Jane Rooney for discussion on issues of extraterritoriality. Finally,
I am also grateful to an anonymous reviewer of EWLR for suggestions on how to polish
the final version of the paper. The standard disclaimer applies, and any remaining
errors are solely my responsibility.