8,619
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
5 collections
    1
    shares
      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A case study from Guyana of adapting engaged research design to promote ‘fairness in knowing’

      research-article
      Overview Bookmark

            Abstract

            In this paper, we have combined ideas drawn from philosophy (epistemic injustice), critical theory (epistemicide) and practical approaches (engaged research design) with Indigenous knowledge to promote ‘fairness in knowing’ in a project called DETECT (Integrate d Spac e Technology V ector Con trol for Enhancing community health and resilience against escalating climatic disruptions), an early warning system to support communities in identifying mosquito breeding sites using satellite, drone and ground-sensing technologies. DETECT used engaged research design to inform pre-award planning. We document how the project team, comprising Indigenous and other researchers, re-imagined the plans in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic to allow project participants to meet safely and equitably, and reflect on some of the key challenges in engaging across borders and cultures in the context of rapidly changing conditions characterised by vulnerability, risk, complexity and uncertainty.

            Author and article information

            Journal
            rfa
            Research for All
            UCL Press (UK )
            2399-8121
            17 May 2022
            : 6
            : 1
            : 12
            Affiliations
            [1 ]The Open University, UK
            [2 ]Cobra Collective Community Interest Company
            [3 ]Royal Holloway, University of London, UK
            [4 ]North Rupununi District Development Board
            [5 ]Iwokrama International Centre for Rainforest Conservation and Development
            Author notes
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4587-0929
            https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7626-0675
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4384-5997
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3546-4916
            https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7582-3739
            Article
            10.14324/RFA.06.1.12
            ba587e63-d477-4747-8ed8-285c4a66c907
            Copyright 2022, Richard Holliman, Alessandra Marino, Ann Grand, Andrea Berardi, Jay Mistry, Deirdre Jafferally, Raquel Thomas, Grace Roberts, Carol-Ann Marcus, Indranee Roopsind and Anthony Roberts

            This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

            History
            : 20 July 2021
            : 31 March 2022
            Page count
            Figures: 3, References: 42, Pages: 17
            Categories
            Article

            Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Education & Public policy,Educational research & Statistics
            community-based research,international development,malaria,organisational change,planning,upstream engagement,engaged research design,epistemic justice,epistemology,Indigenous self-determination

            Comments

            Comment on this article