This is a conclusion to a special issue on extraterritoriality on EU law and human rights. It offers some reflections on the articles in the special issue, in particular from the perspective of public international law and international trade law. In this context, it looks at the distinction between the right of a State to regulate activities beyond its jurisdiction, and its obligation – including under human rights law – to do so. It also looks at how the answer might differ according to whether the form of regulation is direct or – especially common in international trade law, where the direct object of regulation relates to access to a domestic market – indirect.
Author and article information
Journal
Journal ID (publisher-id): EWLR
Title:
Europe and the World: A law review
Abbreviated Title:
Eur. World
Publisher:
UCL Press
ISSN
(Electronic):
2399-2875
Publication date
(Electronic):
10
October
2018
Volume: 2
Issue: 1
Electronic Location Identifier: 8
Affiliations
Reader in International Law, University of Cambridge
How to Cite L Bartels, ‘Extraterritoriality of EU law and human rights after Lisbon: The case
of trade and public procurement: Conclusion’ [2018] 2(
1): 8.
Europe and the World: A law review [3]. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.ewlj.2018.08.