7,559
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Teaching historical thinking in practice: a study of US history teachers’ views on using primary sources in AP and IB history lessons

      research-article
      1 , *
      History Education Research Journal
      UCL Press
      analysis of primary sources, historical thinking, AP lessons, IB teaching

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Analysis of primary sources has been recognised to have a significant impact on the development of students’ historical thinking. This study explored US history teachers’ attitudes and practices to using primary sources by interviewing six history teachers and observing 29 history lessons between August and November 2016 in Indiana and California. The main focus of the study was on the views of International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma Programme and Advancement Placement (AP) history teachers. Results indicated that all teachers valued the use of primary sources and most of them used sources frequently. Notable was the deficiency of source evaluation in AP and Regular history lessons in those schools which did not offer the IB Programme. The IB teachers mentioned source evaluation as a part of the source work throughout, and emphasised the importance of the IB format and other pedagogical support provided by the International Baccalaureate Organization in the use of sources.

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

          Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Basic Content Analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Content analysis: method, applications, and issues.

              Content analysis research methodology is detailed, its procedures are described, some examples of its application are provided, and the controversial issues surrounding its use are discussed. Unlike strictly qualitative designs, content analysis has external validity as a goal. Because of its focus on human communication, content analysis offers practical applicability, promise, and relevance for research involving the practice and education of nurses and other helping professionals.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Hist_Educ_Res_J
                History Education Research Journal
                Hist_Educ_Res_J
                UCL Press
                2631-9713
                31 May 2022
                : 19
                : 1
                : 5
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Jyväskylä, Finland
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-3480
                Article
                Hist_Educ_Res_J-19-5
                10.14324/HERJ.19.1.05
                1815a67b-4dd4-43a8-a651-764917f77632
                © 2022, Susanna Soininen.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.19.1.05.

                History
                : 15 January 2021
                : 26 April 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 12
                Categories
                Research article
                Custom metadata
                Soininen, S. (2022) ‘Teaching historical thinking in practice: a study of US history teachers’ views on using primary sources in AP and IB history lessons’. History Education Research Journal, 19 (1), 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/HERJ.19.1.05.

                Educational research & Statistics,General education,History
                IB teaching,historical thinking,analysis of primary sources,AP lessons

                Comments

                Comment on this article