17
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Rural-urban differences in workplace health promotion among employees of small and medium-sized enterprises in Germany

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Rural and urban areas hold different health challenges and resources for resident small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and their employees. Additionally, residents of urban and rural areas differ in individual characteristics. This study aims at investigating potential rural-urban differences (1) in the participation rate in workplace health promotion (WHP) and (2) in the relationship of WHP and health relevant outcomes in residents living in rural or urban German areas and working in SMEs.

          Methods

          Data of a large German Employee Survey in 2018 were used and analyzed by chi-square and t-tests and regression analyses regarding job satisfaction, sick days, and psychosomatic complaints. A total of 10,763 SME employees was included in analyses (23.9% living in rural, 76.1% living in urban areas).

          Results

          Analyses revealed higher participation rates for SME employees living in rural areas. SME employees living in urban areas reported more often the existence of WHP. Results showed (a) significance of existence of WHP for psychosomatic complaints and (b) significance of participation in WHP for job satisfaction in SME employees living in urban but not for those living in rural areas.

          Conclusion

          The revealed disparities of (1) higher participation rates in SME employees living in rural areas and in (2) the relationship of WHP aspects with health relevant outcomes are of special interest for practitioners (, e.g. human resource managers), politicians, and researchers by providing new indications for planning and evaluating WHP measures.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08052-9.

          Related collections

          Most cited references33

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Work health promotion, job well-being, and sickness absences--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              The aim of this systematic literature analysis was to study the association between work health promotion and job well-being, work ability, absenteeism, and early retirement. This systematic review is a part of a large research project studying multiple workplace factors and interventions that may affect workers' health and well-being. Original articles published in 1970 to 2005 were searched in Medline and PsycINFO databases, the main search terms being health promotion, well-being, work ability, sick leave, and disability pension. Out of 1312 references and 35 potentially eligible publications, 10 studies were included in the analysis. Other sources producing 36 eligible studies, 46 studies in total were included in the analysis. There is moderate evidence that work health promotion decreases sickness absences (risk ratio [RR], 0.78; range, 0.10 to 1.57) and work ability (RR, 1.38; range, 1.15 to 1.66). It also seems to increase mental well-being (RR, 1.39; range, 0.98 to 1.91), but not physical well-being. There is no evidence on disability pension. Exercise seems to increase overall well-being (RR, 1.25; range, 1.05 to 1.47) and work ability (RR, 1.38; range, 1.15 to 1.66), but education and psychological methods do not seem to affect well-being or sickness absences. Sickness absences seem to be reduced by activities promoting healthy lifestyle (RR, 0.80; range, 0.74 to 0.93) and ergonomics (RR, 0.72; range, 0.13 to 1.57). Work health promotion is valuable on employees' well-being and work ability and productive in terms of less sickness absences. Activities involving exercise, lifestyle, and ergonomics are potentially effective. On the other hand, education and psychological means applied alone do not seem effective. Work health promotion should target both physical and psychosocial environments at work.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                lara.lindert@mhb-fontane.de
                lukas.kuehn@mhb-fontane.de
                anna.choi@mhb-fontane.de
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                21 May 2022
                21 May 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 681
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.473452.3, Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, ; Fehrbelliner Str. 38, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.465811.f, ISNI 0000 0004 4904 7440, Danube Private University (DPU) GmbH, ; Steiner Landstraße 124, 3500 Krems-Stein, Austria
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9332-7824
                Article
                8052
                10.1186/s12913-022-08052-9
                9123665
                002daffa-f8a1-4209-9fb2-209313f4fe65
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 7 December 2021
                : 5 May 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg CAMPUS gGmbH (5634)
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Health & Social care
                occupational health,psychosomatic complaints,job satisfaction,sick leave days,employee health

                Comments

                Comment on this article