3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the impact of a ‘bundle of care’ approach to Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in a tertiary hospital

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is evidence that standardised care bundle implementation may improve the rates of appropriate investigations and improve overall management. A S. aureus bacteraemia care bundle was introduced at Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand in early 2014. We assessed the impact of the intervention on the management and outcome of S. aureus bacteraemia.

          Methods

          A cohort study of cases of S. aureus bacteraemia was conducted following standardised care bundle introduction. Prospective enrolment of post-intervention patients occurred from 1 st January 2014 to 30 th June 2015, with retrospective review of pre-intervention cases from 1 st January 2009 to 31 st December 2013.

          Results

          In the pre-intervention period 447 patients had at least one episode of S. aureus bacteraemia compared to 151 patients in the post-intervention period. The two groups were similar by gender, ethnicity, and age. Significant increases in Infectious Diseases consultation rate (86.6% vs 94.8%; p=0.009), echocardiography (76.3% vs 96.3%; p<0.001), urine culture (74.0% vs 91.9%; p<0.001), follow up blood cultures (44.2% vs 83.0%; p<0.001), and at least 2 weeks of parenteral therapy (83.5% vs 92.9%; p=0.014) were observed after introduction of the bundle. There were no significant differences in rates 30-day mortality (18.6% vs. 20.5%; p=0.596), but there was a reduction in episodes of relapsed infection in the post-intervention cohort (7.4% vs 1.3%; p=0.004).

          Conclusion

          An integrated care bundle for the management of S. aureus bacteraemia resulted in increased use of quality of care indicators and infectious diseases review and improved patient outcome.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

            The objective of this study was to develop a prospectively applicable method for classifying comorbid conditions which might alter the risk of mortality for use in longitudinal studies. A weighted index that takes into account the number and the seriousness of comorbid disease was developed in a cohort of 559 medical patients. The 1-yr mortality rates for the different scores were: "0", 12% (181); "1-2", 26% (225); "3-4", 52% (71); and "greater than or equal to 5", 85% (82). The index was tested for its ability to predict risk of death from comorbid disease in the second cohort of 685 patients during a 10-yr follow-up. The percent of patients who died of comorbid disease for the different scores were: "0", 8% (588); "1", 25% (54); "2", 48% (25); "greater than or equal to 3", 59% (18). With each increased level of the comorbidity index, there were stepwise increases in the cumulative mortality attributable to comorbid disease (log rank chi 2 = 165; p less than 0.0001). In this longer follow-up, age was also a predictor of mortality (p less than 0.001). The new index performed similarly to a previous system devised by Kaplan and Feinstein. The method of classifying comorbidity provides a simple, readily applicable and valid method of estimating risk of death from comorbid disease for use in longitudinal studies. Further work in larger populations is still required to refine the approach because the number of patients with any given condition in this study was relatively small.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis.

              Although the sensitivity and specificity of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) have been validated by investigators from Europe and the United States, several shortcomings of this schema remain. The Duke IE database contains records collected prospectively on >800 cases of definite and possible IE since 1984. Databases on echocardiograms and on patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia at Duke University Medical Center are also maintained. Analyses of these databases, our experience with the Duke criteria in clinical practice, and analysis of the work of others have led us to propose the following modifications of the Duke schema. The category "possible IE" should be defined as having at least 1 major criterion and 1 minor criterion or 3 minor criteria. The minor criterion "echocardiogram consistent with IE but not meeting major criterion" should be eliminated, given the widespread use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Bacteremia due to S. aureus should be considered a major criterion, regardless of whether the infection is nosocomially acquired or whether a removable source of infection is present. Positive Q-fever serology should be changed to a major criterion.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Infect Prev Pract
                Infect Prev Pract
                Infection Prevention in Practice
                Elsevier
                2590-0889
                25 September 2020
                December 2020
                25 September 2020
                : 2
                : 4
                : 100096
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Infectious Diseases, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand
                [b ]Department of Microbiology, Canterbury Health Laboratories, Christchurch, New Zealand
                [c ]Department of General Medicine, Christchurch Hospital, New Zealand
                [d ]Department of Pathology, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author: Address: Infectious Diseases and General Physician, Department of Medicine Waikato Hospital, Pembroke street, Private Bag 3200, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand. Tel.: +6421865335. Jared.green@ 123456waikatodhb.health.nz
                Article
                S2590-0889(20)30060-3 100096
                10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100096
                8336039
                34368726
                0c21f721-3b6f-4993-8ce8-5ecd468a9c44
                © 2020 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 2 July 2020
                : 18 September 2020
                Categories
                Original Research Article

                staphylococcus aureus,staphylococcal infection,bacteraemia,patient care bundles,quality improvement

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content706

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors623