13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of HER2/neu expression in different types of salivary gland tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the overexpression rate of HER2 in patients with salivary gland tumors. We included peer-reviewed publications from 1995 to 2020, indexed in medical databases, using search terms such as “human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)” and “salivary gland tumors”, and extracted relevant data. The extracted data were analyzed with RevMan 5.3 software. Intra-and intergroup post hoc analyses of outcome variables were performed using t-tests, and the rates of HER2 positivity among studies were evaluated. 80 studies were included in the analysis. The positive rates of HER2 ranged from 3.3% to 84.0% and 1% to 9% in malignant and benign subtypes, respectively. The highest HER2 overexpression rate among malignant tumors was in salivary ductal carcinomas (SDC), with a 45% positive rate (CI 95%: 21.9–70.3%). Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) had the highest positive rate of 84% (CI 95%: 74.1–90.0%). Among benign salivary gland tumors, the highest rate was found in myoepithelioma, with a positive rate of 9% (CI 95%: 1.7–33.6%). The highest rate of HER2 overexpression is present in malignant subtypes of salivary gland tumors, more specifically in salivary ductal carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinomas, salivary duct carcinoma in situ, and carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.

          Related collections

          Most cited references46

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

          Trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; also known as ERBB2), was investigated in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. ToGA (Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer) was an open-label, international, phase 3, randomised controlled trial undertaken in 122 centres in 24 countries. Patients with gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer were eligible for inclusion if their tumours showed overexpression of HER2 protein by immunohistochemistry or gene amplification by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a chemotherapy regimen consisting of capecitabine plus cisplatin or fluorouracil plus cisplatin given every 3 weeks for six cycles or chemotherapy in combination with intravenous trastuzumab. Allocation was by block randomisation stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, chemotherapy regimen, extent of disease, primary cancer site, and measurability of disease, implemented with a central interactive voice recognition system. The primary endpoint was overall survival in all randomised patients who received study medication at least once. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01041404. 594 patients were randomly assigned to study treatment (trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, n=298; chemotherapy alone, n=296), of whom 584 were included in the primary analysis (n=294; n=290). Median follow-up was 18.6 months (IQR 11-25) in the trastuzumab plus chemotherapy group and 17.1 months (9-25) in the chemotherapy alone group. Median overall survival was 13.8 months (95% CI 12-16) in those assigned to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy compared with 11.1 months (10-13) in those assigned to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio 0.74; 95% CI 0.60-0.91; p=0.0046). The most common adverse events in both groups were nausea (trastuzumab plus chemotherapy, 197 [67%] vs chemotherapy alone, 184 [63%]), vomiting (147 [50%] vs 134 [46%]), and neutropenia (157 [53%] vs 165 [57%]). Rates of overall grade 3 or 4 adverse events (201 [68%] vs 198 [68%]) and cardiac adverse events (17 [6%] vs 18 [6%]) did not differ between groups. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy can be considered as a new standard option for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer. F Hoffmann-La Roche. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Targeted Cancer Therapy: The Next Generation of Cancer Treatment.

            Cancer is one of the leading causes of death in the United States along with heart disease. The hallmark of cancer treatment has been conventional chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic drugs are designed to target not only rapidly dividing cells, such as cancer cells, but also certain normal cells, such as intestinal epithelium. Over the past several years, a new generation of cancer treatment has come to the forefront, i.e, targeted cancer therapies. Like conventional chemotherapy, targeted cancer therapies use pharmacological agents that inhibit growth, increase cell death and restrict the spread of cancer. As the name suggests, targeted therapies interfere with specific proteins involved in tumorigenesis. Rather than using broad base cancer treatments, focusing on specific molecular changes which are unique to a particular cancer, targeted cancer therapies may be more therapeutically beneficial for many cancer types, including lung, colorectal, breast, lymphoma and leukemia. Moreover, recent advances have made it possible to analyze and tailor treatments to an individual patient's tumor. There are three main types of targeted cancer therapies; 1) monoclonal antibodies, 2) small molecule inhibitors and 3) immunotoxins. This review will discuss these three classes of targeted therapies in detail, as well as the biology behind targeted cancer therapies.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

              To update the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in breast cancer to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing and its utility as a predictive marker in invasive breast cancer. ASCO/CAP convened an Update Committee that included coauthors of the 2007 guideline to conduct a systematic literature review and update recommendations for optimal HER2 testing. The Update Committee identified criteria and areas requiring clarification to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH). The guideline was reviewed and approved by both organizations. The Update Committee recommends that HER2 status (HER2 negative or positive) be determined in all patients with invasive (early stage or recurrence) breast cancer on the basis of one or more HER2 test results (negative, equivocal, or positive). Testing criteria define HER2-positive status when (on observing within an area of tumor that amounts to >10% of contiguous and homogeneous tumor cells) there is evidence of protein overexpression (IHC) or gene amplification (HER2 copy number or HER2/CEP17 ratio by ISH based on counting at least 20 cells within the area). If results are equivocal (revised criteria), reflex testing should be performed using an alternative assay (IHC or ISH). Repeat testing should be considered if results seem discordant with other histopathologic findings. Laboratories should demonstrate high concordance with a validated HER2 test on a sufficiently large and representative set of specimens. Testing must be performed in a laboratory accredited by CAP or another accrediting entity. The Update Committee urges providers and health systems to cooperate to ensure the highest quality testing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Med Life
                J Med Life
                JMedLife
                Journal of Medicine and Life
                Carol Davila University Press (Romania )
                1844-122X
                1844-3117
                May 2022
                : 15
                : 5
                : 595-600
                Affiliations
                [1. ]Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
                [2. ]Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America
                [3. ]Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
                Author notes
                [* ] Corresponding Author: Maryam Kouhsoltani, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical sciences, Tabriz, Iran. E-mail: mkoohsoltani@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                JMedLife-15-595
                10.25122/jml-2021-0394
                9262268
                35815077
                0e7a795d-4179-4932-8c46-58d457f05bc0
                © 2022 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 08 December 2021
                : 24 January 2022
                Categories
                Review

                Medicine
                salivary gland,cancer,her2,oral pathology,carcinoma,acc – adenoid cystic carcinomas,her2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2,mec – mucoepidermoid carcinoma,prisma – preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content648

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors816