33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Achieving successful community engagement: a rapid realist review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Community engagement is increasingly seen as crucial to achieving high quality, efficient and collaborative care. However, organisations are still searching for the best and most effective ways to engage citizens in the shaping of health and care services. This review highlights the barriers and enablers for engaging communities in the planning, designing, governing, and/or delivering of health and care services on the macro or meso level. It provides policymakers and professionals with evidence-based guiding principles to implement their own effective community engagement (CE) strategies.

          Methods

          A Rapid Realist Review was conducted to investigate how interventions interact with contexts and mechanisms to influence the effectiveness of CE. A local reference panel, consisting of health and care professionals and experts, assisted in the development of the research questions and search strategy. The panel’s input helped to refine the review’s findings. A systematic search of the peer-reviewed literature was conducted.

          Results

          Eight action-oriented guiding principles were identified:

          • Ensure staff provide supportive and facilitative leadership to citizens based on transparency;

          • foster a safe and trusting environment enabling citizens to provide input;

          • ensure citizens’ early involvement;

          • share decision-making and governance control with citizens;

          • acknowledge and address citizens’ experiences of power imbalances between citizens and professionals;

          • invest in citizens who feel they lack the skills and confidence to engage;

          • create quick and tangible wins;

          • take into account both citizens’ and organisations’ motivations.

          Conclusions

          An especially important thread throughout the CE literature is the influence of power imbalances and organisations’ willingness, or not, to address such imbalances. The literature suggests that ‘meaningful participation’ of citizens can only be achieved if organisational processes are adapted to ensure that they are inclusive, accessible and supportive of citizens.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review

            Background Although community engagement (CE) is widely used in health promotion, components of CE models associated with improved health are poorly understood. This study aimed to examine the magnitude of the impact of CE on health and health inequalities among disadvantaged populations, which methodological approaches maximise the effectiveness of CE, and components of CE that are acceptable, feasible, and effective when used among disadvantaged populations. Design The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We carried out methodological assessments of the included studies using rating scales. The analysis focussed on model synthesis to identify the key CE components linked to positive study outcomes and comparative analysis between positive study outcomes, processes, and quality indicators of CE. Results Out of 24 studies that met our inclusion criteria, 21 (87.5%) had positively impacted health behaviours, public health planning, health service access, health literacy, and a range of health outcomes. More than half of the studies (58%) were of good quality, whereas 71% and 42% of studies showed good community involvement in research and achieved high levels of CE, respectively. Key CE components that affected health outcomes included real power-sharing, collaborative partnerships, bidirectional learning, incorporating the voice and agency of beneficiary communities in research protocol, and using bicultural health workers for intervention delivery. Conclusions The findings suggest that CE models can lead to improved health and health behaviours among disadvantaged populations if designed properly and implemented through effective community consultation and participation. We also found several gaps in the current measurement of CE in health intervention studies, which suggests the importance of developing innovative approaches to measure CE impact on health outcomes in a more rigorous way.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The impact of community engagement on health and social outcomes: a systematic review

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31621583068 , esther.de.weger@rivm.nl
                natascha.van.vooren@rivm.nl
                k.g.luijkx@tilburguniversity.edu
                caroline.baan@rivm.nl
                hanneke.drewes@rivm.nl
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                13 April 2018
                13 April 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 285
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Quality of Care and Health Economics, Centre for Nutrition, Prevent and Health Services, National Institute for Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0943 3265, GRID grid.12295.3d, Tilburg University, Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, ; PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
                Article
                3090
                10.1186/s12913-018-3090-1
                5899371
                29653537
                0ea65df5-2602-49e9-b703-c984f3fdf27d
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 13 November 2017
                : 3 April 2018
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Health & Social care
                community engagement,citizen engagement,community participation,healthcare,rapid realist review,realist evaluation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content104

                Cited by68

                Most referenced authors782