7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      THE VULNERABILITY OF SUSPECTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES DURING POLICE INTERVIEWS: A REVIEW AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF DECISION-MAKING

      ,
      Mental Handicap Research
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references6

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation, and acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): Implications for reliability during police interrogations

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A parallel form of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The inter-rater reliability of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (form 2).

              The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS) is widely used, particularly in the preparation of court reports, to derive information on the memory, suggestibility and confabulation of criminal suspects, victims and witnesses. The inter-rater reliability of all these measures was assessed by three raters, using the data of 101 subjects who were tested on the parallel form of the scale (GSS2). The intra-class correlation coefficients for all the memory and suggestibility measures were both very high (.951-.996) and highly significant (p < .001 for all measures), indicating a high level of inter-rater reliability. In contrast, whilst still highly significant (p < .001), the correlations for confabulation on immediate and delayed recall were much lower (.724 and .803, respectively). Guidelines are provided to refine the scoring of memory and suggestibility and to clarify the definition of confabulation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Mental Handicap Research
                Wiley
                09529608
                June 1995
                March 25 2010
                : 8
                : 2
                : 110-128
                Article
                10.1111/j.1468-3148.1995.tb00149.x
                17002539-19ab-4110-9599-37e39fb888a9
                © 2010

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article