24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Epidemiology of CKD and its Complications

      Submit here by August 31, 2024

      About Kidney and Blood Pressure Research: 2.3 Impact Factor I 4.8 CiteScore I 0.674 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      End-Stage Renal Failure Patients Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit: Incidence, Clinical Features, and Outcome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims: To study incidence, clinical features, and outcome of critically ill patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and to test the validity of severity scoring systems for these patients. Methods: Data for ESRF patients treated with RRT were collected from 81 Australian adult ICUs providing RRT. They were compared with matched controls with acute renal failure. Results: Thirty-eight ESRF patients received RRT in the ICU over 3 months. The mean APACHE II score was 21.8 (predicted mortality: 37%) and the SAPS II score 44.7 (predicted mortality: 37%). The hospital mortality was 34%. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed good discrimination ability for hospital mortality for these two scores (AUC: 0.81 for APACHE II and 0.84 for SAPS II). Using admission diagnosis and SAPS II scores, 32 ESRF patients treated with continuous RRT (CRRT) were matched to 32 acute renal failure patients also treated with CRRT. ICU mortality (22 vs. 38%) and hospital mortality (38 vs. 38%) were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions: ESRF patients requiring RRT in the ICU were relatively frequent. Severity scores could be used to predict the hospital outcome for these patients. Their mortality, when treated with CRRT, was similar to that of diagnosis- and severity-score-matched patients with acute renal failure.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Epidemiology, management, and outcome of severe acute renal failure of critical illness in Australia.

          To study the epidemiology, style of management, and outcome of intensive care patients with acute renal failure requiring replacement therapy in Australia. Prospective epidemiologic study. Australian adult intensive care units providing acute renal replacement therapy. Adult intensive care patients with acute renal failure treated with renal replacement therapy. Demographic and clinical data collection for 3 months. A standardized data collection form for each case of severe acute renal failure was used to collect demographic, biochemical, clinical, and outcome data. Severe acute renal failure affected 299 patients (approximately eight cases per 100,000 adults per year). Among these patients, 99 (33.1%) had impaired baseline renal function, 238 (79.6%) needed mechanical ventilation, and 232 (77.6%) needed continuous vasoactive drug administration. Critical care physicians controlled patient care and renal replacement therapy in 289 cases (96.7%). Critical care nurses performed such therapy alone in 288 (96.3%) cases. Continuous renal replacement therapy was used in 292 (97.7%) patients. There was no nephrological input in 173 (57.8%) cases. Predicted mortality rates were 52.1% by Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, 49.5% by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and 51.9% by an acute renal failure-specific score. Actual mortality rate was 46.8%. Only 25 (15.7%) patients were dialysis-dependent at hospital discharge. Of these patients, 20 (80%) had premorbid chronic impairment of renal function. In Australia, critical care physicians and nurses manage severe acute renal failure with limited consultative nephrological input. Renal replacement therapy is continuous and outcomes are satisfactory. Our findings support the view that this approach to management of severe acute renal failure is safe.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Predicting patient outcome from acute renal failure comparing three general severity of illness scoring systems.

            A major problem of studies on acute renal failure (ARF) arises from a lack of prognostic tools able to express the medical complexity of the syndrome adequately and to predict patient outcome accurately. Our study was thus aimed at evaluating the predictive ability of three general prognostic models [version II of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), version II of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II), and version II of the Mortality Probability Model at 24 hours (MPM24 II)] in a prospective, single-center cohort of patients with ARF in an intermediate nephrology care unit. Four hundred twenty-five patients consecutively admitted for ARF to the Nephrology and Internal Medicine Department over a five-year period were studied (272 males and 153 females, median age 71 years, interquartile range 61 to 78, median APACHE II score 23, interquartile range 18 to 28). Acute tubular necrosis (ATN) accounted for 68.7% (292 out of 425) of patients. Renal replacement therapies (hemodialysis or continuous hemofiltration) were used in 64% (272 out of 425) of ARF patients. Observed mortality was 39.1% (166 out of 425). The mean predicted mortality was 36.2% with APACHE II (P = 0.571 vs. observed mortality), 39.3% with SAPS II (P = 0.232), and 45.1% with MPM24 II (P < 0.0001). Lemeshow-Hosmer goodness-of-fit C and H statistics were 15.67 (P = 0.047) and 12.05 (P = 0.15) with APACHE II, 32.53 (P = 0.0001), 39.8 (P = 0.0001) with SAPS II, 21.86 (P = 0.005), and 20. 24 (P = 0.009) with MPM24 II, respectively. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were 0.75, 0.77, and 0.85, respectively. The APACHE II model was a slightly better calibrated predictor of group outcome in ARF patients, as compared with the SAPS II and MPM24 II outcome prediction models. The MPM24 II model showed the best discrimination capacity, in comparison with both APACHE II and SAPS II models, but it constantly and significantly overestimated mean predicted mortality in ARF patients. None of the models provided sufficient confidence for the prediction of outcome in individual patients. A high degree of caution must be exerted in the application of existing general prognostic models for outcome prediction in ARF patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Outcomes and APACHE II predictions for critically ill patients with acute renal failure requiring dialysis.

              Despite the widespread availability of dialytic and intensive care unit technology, the probability of early mortality in critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) is still high, and the evaluation of the patients' prognosis has been difficult. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score is a reliable indicator of severity of illness and likelihood of survival in critically ill patients with ARF. We have attempted to determine whether the APACHE II scoring system can be used to predict prognosis.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BPU
                Blood Purif
                10.1159/issn.0253-5068
                Blood Purification
                S. Karger AG
                0253-5068
                1421-9735
                2003
                2003
                26 February 2003
                : 21
                : 2
                : 170-175
                Affiliations
                Departments of Intensive Care and Medicine, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia
                Article
                69156 Blood Purif 2003;21:170–175
                10.1159/000069156
                12601260
                29ac2375-819b-4fe8-9ad9-5ff246e9a697
                © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 30 October 2002
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, References: 20, Pages: 6
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Acute renal failure,Critical illness,Epidemiology,Renal replacement therapy,Illness severity scores,Chronic renal failure

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content122

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors43