11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder and Risk-Need-Responsivity Model: A guide for criminal justice and forensic mental health professionals

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is an umbrella term used to describe a range of significant neurodevelopmental, brain-based disorders and impairments that result from prenatal alcohol exposure. FASD is a high prevalence but underdiagnosed group of disorders affecting between 17 and 36% of individuals in criminal justice settings. Despite being a high-impact disorder associated with lifelong impairments with a significant need for services and interventions, little research has been completed on how to best support individuals with these conditions in criminal justice settings. This article proposes a renewed focus on applying and adapting the Risk-Need-Responsivity (RNR) approach to individuals with FASD in criminal justice settings. This will assist in better determining the needs and interventions likely to effect change and reduce recidivism for this prominent criminal justice-based population. The RNR approach has been used with multiple corrections populations to determine the need and most appropriate interventions, as well as how to best allocate scarce resources. As the prevalence of FASD becomes better understood and recognized, evidence-based approaches to addressing this specific sub-population are necessary to effect change and reduce recidivism and ongoing involvement in the criminal justice system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references73

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Classification for Effective Rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders in 4 US Communities

            Question How common are fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in the United States? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 13 146 first-grade children in 4 regions of the United States surveyed between 2010 and 2016, the most conservative prevalence estimate for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders ranged from 11.3 to 50.0 per 1000 children. Using a weighted approach, the estimated prevalence was 31.1 to 98.5 per 1000 children. Meaning These findings may represent more accurate US prevalence estimates than previous studies but may not be generalizable to all communities. Importance Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders are costly, life-long disabilities. Older data suggested the prevalence of the disorder in the United States was 10 per 1000 children; however, there are few current estimates based on larger, diverse US population samples. Objective To estimate the prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, including fetal alcohol syndrome, partial fetal alcohol syndrome, and alcohol-related neurodevelopmental disorder, in 4 regions of the United States. Design, Setting, and Participants Active case ascertainment methods using a cross-sectional design were used to assess children for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders between 2010 and 2016. Children were systematically assessed in the 4 domains that contribute to the fetal alcohol spectrum disorder continuum: dysmorphic features, physical growth, neurobehavioral development, and prenatal alcohol exposure. The settings were 4 communities in the Rocky Mountain, Midwestern, Southeastern, and Pacific Southwestern regions of the United States. First-grade children and their parents or guardians were enrolled. Exposures Alcohol consumption during pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures Prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in the 4 communities was the main outcome. Conservative estimates for the prevalence of the disorder and 95% CIs were calculated using the eligible first-grade population as the denominator. Weighted prevalences and 95% CIs were also estimated, accounting for the sampling schemes and using data restricted to children who received a full evaluation. Results A total of 6639 children were selected for participation from a population of 13 146 first-graders (boys, 51.9%; mean age, 6.7 years [SD, 0.41] and white maternal race, 79.3%). A total of 222 cases of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders were identified. The conservative prevalence estimates for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders ranged from 11.3 (95% CI, 7.8-15.8) to 50.0 (95% CI, 39.9-61.7) per 1000 children. The weighted prevalence estimates for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders ranged from 31.1 (95% CI, 16.1-54.0) to 98.5 (95% CI, 57.5-139.5) per 1000 children. Conclusions and Relevance Estimated prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders among first-graders in 4 US communities ranged from 1.1% to 5.0% using a conservative approach. These findings may represent more accurate US prevalence estimates than previous studies but may not be generalizable to all communities. This community-based cohort study used active-case ascertainment to estimate the prevalence of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders among first-graders living in 4 diverse communities in the United States.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: a guideline for diagnosis across the lifespan.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                27 January 2023
                2022
                : 13
                : 689837
                Affiliations
                [1] 1American Institute for the Advancement of Forensic Studies , St. Paul, MN, United States
                [2] 2Concordia University , St. Paul, MN, United States
                [3] 3Metropolitan State University , St. Paul, MN, United States
                [4] 4American Institute for the Advancement of Forensic Studies (AIAFS) , St. Paul, MN, United States
                [5] 5University of Washington , Seattle, WA, United States
                [6] 6Department of Social and Health Services, Special Commitment Center , Steilacoom, WA, United States
                [7] 7JumpStart Psychology , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Samuel Adjorlolo, University of Ghana, Ghana

                Reviewed by: Clare Sarah Allely, University of Salford, United Kingdom; Joan E. Van Horn, De Forensische Zorgspecialisten, Netherlands

                *Correspondence: Jerrod Brown, jerrod01234brown@ 123456live.com

                This article was submitted to Forensic and Legal Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2022.689837
                9911866
                36778163
                2a38f76d-0012-4984-a89d-15f8f89e3ea2
                Copyright © 2023 Brown, Arvidson, Carter and Spiller.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 April 2021
                : 17 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 74, Pages: 13, Words: 10833
                Categories
                Psychology
                Review

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                fetal alcohol spectrum disorder,risk need responsivity model,criminal justice,forensic mental health,recidivism

                Comments

                Comment on this article