9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association between perinatal interventional activity and 2-year outcome of Swiss extremely preterm born infants: a population-based cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To investigate if centre-specific levels of perinatal interventional activity were associated with neonatal and neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age in two separately analysed cohorts of infants: cohort A born at 22–25 and cohort B born at 26–27 gestational weeks, respectively.

          Design

          Geographically defined, retrospective cohort study.

          Setting

          All nine level III perinatal centres (neonatal intensive care units and affiliated obstetrical services) in Switzerland.

          Patients

          All live-born infants in Switzerland in 2006–2013 below 28 gestational weeks, excluding infants with major congenital malformation.

          Outcome measures

          Outcomes at 2 years corrected for prematurity were mortality, survival with any major neonatal morbidity and with severe-to-moderate neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI).

          Results

          Cohort A associated birth in a centre with high perinatal activity with low mortality adjusted OR (aOR 0.22; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.32), while no association was observed with survival with major morbidity (aOR 0.74; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.19) and with NDI (aOR 0.97; 95% CI 0.46 to 2.02). Median age at death (8 vs 4 days) and length of stay (100 vs 73 days) were higher in high than in low activity centres. The results for cohort B mirrored those for cohort A.

          Conclusions

          Centres with high perinatal activity in Switzerland have a significantly lower risk for mortality while having comparable outcomes among survivors. This confirms the results of other studies but in a geographically defined area applying a more restrictive approach to initiation of perinatal intensive care than previous studies. The study adds that infants up to 28 weeks benefited from a higher perinatal activity and why further research is required to better estimate the added burden on children who ultimately do not survive.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006.

          For a variety of reasons, the definition and the classification of cerebral palsy (CP) need to be reconsidered. Modern brain imaging techniques have shed new light on the nature of the underlying brain injury and studies on the neurobiology of and pathology associated with brain development have further explored etiologic mechanisms. It is now recognized that assessing the extent of activity restriction is part of CP evaluation and that people without activity restriction should not be included in the CP rubric. Also, previous definitions have not given sufficient prominence to the non-motor neurodevelopmental disabilities of performance and behaviour that commonly accompany CP, nor to the progression of musculoskeletal difficulties that often occurs with advancing age. In order to explore this information, pertinent material was reviewed on July 11-13, 2004 at an international workshop in Bethesda, MD (USA) organized by an Executive Committee and participated in by selected leaders in the preclinical and clinical sciences. At the workshop, it was agreed that the concept 'cerebral palsy' should be retained. Suggestions were made about the content of a revised definition and classification of CP that would meet the needs of clinicians, investigators, health officials, families and the public and would provide a common language for improved communication. Panels organized by the Executive Committee used this information and additional comments from the international community to generate a report on the Definition and Classification of Cerebral Palsy, April 2006. The Executive Committee presents this report with the intent of providing a common conceptualization of CP for use by a broad international audience.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy.

            To address the need for a standardized system to classify the gross motor function of children with cerebral palsy, the authors developed a five-level classification system analogous to the staging and grading systems used in medicine. Nominal group process and Delphi survey consensus methods were used to examine content validity and revise the classification system until consensus among 48 experts (physical therapists, occupational therapists, and developmental pediatricians with expertise in cerebral palsy) was achieved. Interrater reliability (kappa) was 0.55 for children less than 2 years of age and 0.75 for children 2 to 12 years of age. The classification system has application for clinical practice, research, teaching, and administration.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Using the Bayley-III to assess neurodevelopmental delay: which cut-off should be used?

              As the latest edition of the Bayley Scales (Bayley-III) produces higher scores than its predecessor (BSID-II), there is uncertainty about how to classify moderate-severe neurodevelopmental delay. We have investigated agreement between classifications of delay made using the BSID-II and Bayley-III. BSID-II Mental Development Index (MDI) and Bayley-III cognitive and language scales were administered in 185 extremely preterm (<27 wk) children. A combined Bayley-III score (CB-III) was computed. Agreement between delay classified using MDI scores <70 and various Bayley-III cut-offs was assessed. Bayley-III cognitive and language scores were close to the normative mean and were higher than BSID-II MDI scores. Nineteen (10.2%) children had MDI <70. Bayley-III scores <70 significantly underestimated the proportion with MDI <70. Bayley-III cognitive and language scores <85 had 99% agreement with MDI <70 and underestimated delay by 1.1%. CB-III scores <80 had 98% agreement and produced the same proportion with delay. Bayley-III cognitive and language scores <85 or CB-III scores <80 provide the best definition of moderate-severe neurodevelopmental delay for equivalence with MDI <70. CB-III scores have the advantage of producing a single continuous outcome measure but require further validation. The relative accuracy of both tests for predicting long-term outcomes requires investigation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2019
                15 March 2019
                : 9
                : 3
                : e024560
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Neonatology , Universitätsspital Zürich , Zürich, Switzerland
                [2 ] departmentEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute , University Zürich , Zürich, Schweiz, Switzerland
                [3 ] departmentNeonatal and Paediatric Intensive Care Unit , Kinderspital Luzern , Luzern, Switzerland
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Paediatrics , Geneva University Hospital , Geneva, Switzerland
                [5 ] departmentDepartment Woman-Mother-Child , University Hospital Lausanne , Lausanne, Switzerland
                [6 ] departmentDivision of Neuropaediatrics, Development and Rehabilitation , Children’s University Hospital, Inselspital, University of Bern , Bern, Switzerland
                [7 ] departmentDepartment of Neonatology , University of Basel Children’s Hospital (UKBB) , Basel, Switzerland
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Mark Adams; mark.adams@ 123456usz.ch
                Article
                bmjopen-2018-024560
                10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024560
                6429852
                30878980
                30c310c0-5849-4943-b8e5-8c64420eee5d
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 01 June 2018
                : 05 October 2018
                : 11 January 2019
                Categories
                Paediatrics
                Research
                1506
                1719
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                neonatology,fetal medicine,quality in health care
                Medicine
                neonatology, fetal medicine, quality in health care

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content217

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors450