Alcohol Use, Screening, and Brief Intervention Among Pregnant Persons — 24 U.S. Jurisdictions, 2017 and 2019

Abstract

Alcohol use during pregnancy is a major preventable cause of adverse alcohol-related outcomes, including birth defects and developmental disabilities.* Alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) is an evidence-based primary care tool that has been shown to prevent or reduce alcohol consumption during pregnancy; interventions have resulted in an increase in the proportion of pregnant women reporting abstinence (odds ratio = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.43–3.56) ( 1 ). Previous national estimates have not characterized ASBI in populations of pregnant persons. Using 2017 and 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, CDC examined prevalence of ASBI and characteristics of pregnant persons and nonpregnant women aged 18–49 years (reproductive-aged women) residing in jurisdictions that participated in the BRFSS ASBI module. During their most recent health care visit within the past 2 years, approximately 80% of pregnant persons reported being asked about their alcohol use; however, only 16% of pregnant persons who self-reported current drinking at the time of the survey (at least one alcoholic beverage in the past 30 days) were advised by a health care provider to quit drinking or reduce their alcohol use. Further, the prevalence of screening among pregnant persons who did not graduate from high school was lower than that among those who did graduate from high school or had at least some college education. This gap between screening and brief intervention, along with disparities in screening based on educational level, indicate missed opportunities to reduce alcohol use during pregnancy. Strategies to enhance ASBI during pregnancy include integrating screenings into electronic health records, increasing reimbursement for ASBI services, developing additional tools, including electronic ASBI, that can be implemented in a variety of settings ( 2 , 3 ). There is no known safe amount of alcohol, type of alcohol, or timing of alcohol use during pregnancy or while trying to become pregnant. Alcohol use among pregnant persons remains a public health concern. During 2015–2017, 11.5% of pregnant U.S. women aged 18–44 years reported current drinking ( 4 ), and during 2018–2020, 13.5% of pregnant adults aged 18–49 years reported current drinking ( 5 ). Brief intervention or behavioral counseling conducted in a primary care setting has been shown to increase the likelihood of abstaining from alcohol during pregnancy ( 1 ). The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends implementing ASBI for all adults aged ≥18 years in primary health care settings, including those who are pregnant, to reduce excessive alcohol use, which includes any alcohol use while pregnant ( 6 ). Despite these recommendations for universal screening, some populations might not be screened as frequently as others ( 7 ). BRFSS is a cross-sectional, random-digit–dialed, annual telephone survey of noninstitutionalized U.S. adults aged ≥18 years † that collects data on health-related behaviors. CDC analyzed data from 23 states and the District of Columbia § that participated in an optional BRFSS ASBI module in 2017 and 2019 ¶ (unweighted sample size = 248,901; median response rate = 45.9% [2017] and 49.4% [2019]). For states that participated in the ASBI module both years (California, Kansas, and Nebraska), analytic weights were adjusted proportionally to their sample size for each year. Pregnant persons** and reproductive-aged women were compared by age, race and ethnicity, †† education level, §§ employment status, ¶¶ disability status,*** HIV risk, ††† experience of frequent mental distress, §§§ chronic conditions, ¶¶¶ health insurance status,**** having a usual health care provider, †††† residence in a state with expanded Medicaid, §§§§ cigarette use, ¶¶¶¶ any alcohol use,***** and binge drinking. ††††† Analyses were conducted to estimate the prevalence of alcohol use and screening §§§§§ among pregnant persons and reproductive-aged women who visited a health care provider in the past 2 years. Prevalence of brief intervention ¶¶¶¶¶ was calculated among pregnant persons. Prevalence estimates and 95% CIs were standardized to the age distribution of persons who gave birth to a live singleton infant in 2017 using vital statistics data.****** Survey procedures with Taylor series variance and weights were used to account for the sample design and nonresponse. Wald chi-square tests were used to test for differences with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. All analyses were conducted using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute). BRFSS data are publicly available, and their use is not subject to human subjects review. This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy. †††††† Among 950 pregnant persons in jurisdictions included in the 2017 and 2019 BRFSS ASBI module, 13.3% reported current drinking and 6.9% reported binge drinking (Table 1). Among reproductive-aged women, 56.4% reported current drinking and 20.2% reported binge drinking. Overall, 80.1% of pregnant persons and 86.0% of reproductive-aged women reported being screened for alcohol use at their last visit to a health care provider (Table 2). Pregnant persons who did not graduate from high school reported a lower prevalence of alcohol screening (53.5%) compared with those who graduated from high school (83.4%) and those with at least some college education (84.5%). A higher proportion of pregnant persons who reported behaviors that might increase the risk for HIV transmission were screened (95.8%) than were those without reported risk behaviors (78.6%). No significant differences in screening prevalence among pregnant persons were observed based on race and ethnicity, disability status, frequent mental distress, health insurance status, having a usual health care provider, or living in a Medicaid expansion state. However, among reproductive-aged women, screening prevalence was lower among those who were non-Hispanic and of another race or ethnicity (i.e., American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, or multiracial) than among those who were Hispanic or Latino, non-Hispanic Black or African American, and non-Hispanic White. Screening prevalence was also lower among reproductive-aged women who did not have health insurance than among those with any health insurance. Among pregnant persons who reported current drinking at the time of the survey, 96.7% (95% CI = 93.4–100.0) reported having been screened at their most recent health care visit. TABLE 1 Age-standardized* characteristics of pregnant persons and nonpregnant reproductive-aged women — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention module, 23 states and the District of Columbia, † 2017 and 2019 Characteristic§ Weighted % (95% CI) P-value Pregnant persons¶
(unweighted n = 950) Nonpregnant reproductive-aged women
(unweighted n = 28,476) Age group, yrs 18–24 25.1 (20.5–29.7) 22.4 (21.5–23.3) <0.001 25–34 53.2 (48.0–58.4) 30.9 (30.0–31.8) 35–49 21.7 (17.5–25.9) 46.7 (45.8–47.6) Race and ethnicity Black or African American, non-Hispanic 13.9 (10.1–17.7) 15.4 (14.5–16.3) 0.113 Hispanic or Latino 28.1 (23.4–32.8) 23.7 (22.7–24.7) White, non-Hispanic 45.7 (40.6–50.9) 48.6 (47.4–49.7) Other, non-Hispanic** 12.2 (8.4–16.1) 12.3 (11.4–13.1) Education †† Did not graduate from high school 15.3 (10.7–19.9) 11.0 (10.1–11.8) 0.116 Graduated from high school 24.1 (19.7–28.4) 23.9 (22.9–24.9) Some college or more 60.7 (55.4–66.0) 65.1 (63.9–66.3) Employment status§§ Employed 57.3 (52.1–62.6) 62.3 (61.1–63.4) 0.030 Not employed 42.7 (37.4–47.9) 37.7 (36.6–38.9) Disability status¶¶ Reported disability 13.7 (9.6–17.8) 18.5 (17.6–19.4) 0.016 No reported disability 86.3 (82.2–90.4) 81.5 (80.6–82.4) Reported behaviors that increase risk for HIV transmission*** Yes 8.3 (5.7–11.0) 10.1 (9.4–10.9) 0.996 No 91.7 (89.0–94.3) 89.9 (89.1–90.6) Mental distress††† Frequent mental distress 11.6 (7.7–15.5) 16.9 (16.0–17.7) 0.030 No frequent mental distress 88.4 (84.5–92.3) 83.1 (82.3–84.0) Chronic conditions§§§ Any chronic condition 55.4 (49.0–61.8) 57.1 (55.7–58.5) 0.123 No chronic condition 44.6 (38.2–51.0) 42.9 (41.5–44.3) Health insurance status¶¶¶ Any health insurance 88.9 (85.7–92.2) 86.6 (85.8–87.5) 0.507 No health insurance 11.1 (7.8–14.3) 13.4 (12.5–14.2) Health care provider**** Has a usual health care provider 75.2 (70.7–79.7) 76.5 (75.5–77.5) 0.033 Does not have a usual health care provider 24.8 (20.3–29.3) 23.5 (22.5–24.5) Medicaid expansion†††† Lives in Medicaid expansion state 62.9 (58.0–67.7) 62.9 (62.1–63.7) 0.841 Does not live in Medicaid expansion state 37.1 (32.3–42.0) 37.1 (36.3–37.9) Alcohol use Current drinking §§§§ 13.3 (8.9–17.6) 56.4 (55.2–57.5) <0.001 Binge drinking¶¶¶¶ 6.9 (3.0–10.8) 20.2 (19.2–21.1) <0.001 Cigarette use***** Every day or some days 5.4 (2.7–8.0) 12.6 (11.8–13.3) <0.001 No cigarette use 94.6 (92.0–97.3) 87.4 (86.7–88.2) Abbreviation: BRFSS = Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. * Prevalence estimates and 95% CIs were standardized to the age distribution of persons who gave birth to a live singleton infant in 2017 using vital statistics data. https://wonder.cdc.gov/ † Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin. § Not all response categories were mutually exclusive. ¶ Self-reported pregnancy was based on responses to the question, “To your knowledge, are you now pregnant?” This question is asked if the respondent’s sex is female and respondent was aged ≤49 years. ** Includes persons who are American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and multiracial. †† Self-reported education level was based on computed levels as follows: “Did not graduate High School,” “Graduated High School,” “Attended College or Technical School,” and “Graduated from College or Technical School.” Responses to “Attended College or Technical School” and “Graduated from College or Technical School” were combined to a variable of “Some college or more.” §§ Employment status included employed for wages or self-employed. Unemployment status included being out of work for ≥1 year, out of work for <1 year, a homemaker, a student, retired, or unable to work. ¶¶ Disability was defined as responding “yes” to any of the following questions: “Are you deaf or do you have serious difficulty hearing?,” “Are you blind or do you have serious difficulty seeing, even when wearing glasses?,” “Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, do you have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?,” “Do you have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs?,” “Do you have difficulty dressing or bathing?” and “Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, do you have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping?” *** Respondents were classified as reporting behaviors that might increase the risk of HIV transmission if they reported at least one of the following: 1) injection of any drug other than prescribed in the past year, 2) being treated for a sexually transmitted disease in the past year, 3) having given or received money or drugs in exchange for sex in the past year, 4) had anal sex without a condom in the past year, or 5) had four or more sexual partners in the past year. ††† Frequent mental distress was based on responses to the question, “Now thinking about your mental health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good?” where ≥14 days was considered frequent mental distress. §§§ Chronic condition was defined as ever being told by a health care provider that the person had a heart attack, angina, coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension (including gestational hypertension), diabetes (including gestational diabetes), arthritis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, depression, any cancer, or chronic kidney disease. ¶¶¶ Health insurance status was based on responses to the question, “Do you have any kind of health care coverage, including health insurance, prepaid plans such as health maintenance organizations, or government plans such as Medicare, or Indian Health Service?” **** Having a usual health care provider was based on responses to the question, “Do you have one person you think of as your personal doctor or health care provider?” where one or more than one was included. †††† States were included that had expanded Medicaid before 2017 or 2019, depending on the year or years each state was included in the BRFSS Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention module survey. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/status-of-state-medicaid-expansion-decisions-interactive-map/ §§§§ Self-reported current drinking was based on the BRFSS calculated variable of “Adults who reported having had at least one drink of alcohol in the past 30 days.” ¶¶¶¶ Self-reported binge drinking was based on the BRFSS calculated variable of “Considering all types of alcoholic beverages, how many times during the past 30 days did you have ≥5 drinks [for men] or ≥4 drinks [for women] on an occasion?” ***** Cigarette use was based on responses to the questions, “Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your entire life?” and “Do you now smoke cigarettes every day, some days, or not at all?” Responses of “every day” and “some days” were combined to create a dichotomous variable of cigarette use, and persons who responded “no” to the question “Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your entire life?” were combined with persons who reported “not at all.” TABLE 2 Age-standardized* prevalence of alcohol screening † by a health care provider in the past 2 years, by pregnancy status among women of reproductive age — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention module, 23 states and the District of Columbia,§ 2017 and 2019 Characteristic¶ Alcohol screening prevalence Pregnant persons**
(unweighted n = 753*) Nonpregnant reproductive-aged women
(unweighted n = 22,440*) Weighted %
(95% CI) P-value Weighted %
(95% CI) P-value Total 80.1 (75.3–84.8) — 86.0 (84.9–87.0) — Age group, yrs 18–24 78.8 (69.9–87.7) 0.738 83.0 (80.9–85.2) <0.001 25–34 79.6 (72.8–86.4) 86.8 (85.3–88.3) 35–49 83.4 (75.0–91.8) 87.3 (86.3–88.3) Race and ethnicity Black or African American, non-Hispanic 79.7 (67.1–92.3) 0.472 85.1 (82.9–87.3) <0.001 Hispanic or Latino 79.0 (69.1–88.8) 86.3 (84.7–87.9) White, non-Hispanic 83.2 (77.2–89.2) 88.4 (87.3–89.6) Other, non-Hispanic†† 69.6 (53.1–86.1) 77.1 (73.4–80.7) Education§§ Did not graduate from high school 53.5 (35.5–71.5) <0.001 82.4 (79.7–85.1) <0.001 Graduated from high school 83.4 (75.1–91.7) 83.0 (81.2–84.9) Some college or more 84.5 (79.9–89.0) 87.8 (86.6–88.9) Employment status¶¶ Employed 82.2 (76.6–87.9) 0.283 87.6 (86.5–88.8) <0.001 Not employed 77.3 (69.4–85.2) 83.6 (81.9–85.2) Disability status*** Reported disability 86.5 (78.1–94.9) 0.193 85.3 (83.6–87.1) 0.451 No reported disability 79.3 (74.1–84.5) 86.1 (85.0–87.3) Reported behaviors that increase risk for HIV transmission ††† Yes 95.8 (90.2–100.0) <0.001 88.4 (85.2–91.7) 0.318 No 78.6 (73.5–83.7) 85.7 (84.7–86.8) Mental distress§§§ Frequent mental distress 89.6 (81.7–97.5) 0.072 87.0 (85.1–88.9) 0.359 No frequent mental distress 79.4 (74.2–84.5) 85.8 (84.6–86.9) Chronic conditions¶¶¶ Chronic condition 83.6 (76.8–90.4) 0.261 86.8 (85.5–88.2) <0.001 No chronic condition 78.3 (69.7–87.0) 83.3 (81.4–85.3) Health insurance status**** Any health insurance 80.4 (75.4–85.4) 0.672 87.0 (86.0–88.1) <0.001 No health insurance 77.0 (63.2–90.9) 79.3 (76.4–82.1) Health care provider†††† Has a usual health care provider 79.8 (74.3–85.3) 0.825 86.5 (85.4–87.7) 0.006 Does not have a usual health care provider 80.7 (71.6–89.7) 84.2 (82.2–86.2) Medicaid expansion§§§§ Lives in Medicaid expansion state 78.8 (72.4–85.1) 0.498 85.7 (84.4–87.0) 0.317 Does not live in Medicaid expansion state 82.1 (75.6–88.6) 86.5 (85.2–87.7) Abbreviation: BRFSS = Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. * Prevalence estimates and 95% CIs were standardized to the age distribution of persons who gave birth to a live singleton infant in 2017 using vital statistics data. https://wonder.cdc.gov/ † Alcohol screening was based on responses to the question, “You told me earlier that your last routine checkup was [within the past 2 years]. At that checkup, were you asked in person or on a form if you drink alcohol?” Among 950 pregnant persons who had a health checkup in the past 2 years, 753 (79.3%) had nonmissing data on alcohol screening. Among 28,476 nonpregnant women of reproductive age who had a health checkup in the past 2 years, 22,440 (78.8%) had nonmissing data on alcohol screening. § Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin. ¶ Not all response categories were mutually exclusive. ** Self-reported pregnancy was based on responses to the question, “To your knowledge, are you now pregnant?” This question is asked if the respondent’s sex is female and respondent was aged ≤49 years. †† Includes persons who are American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and multiracial. §§ Self-reported education level was based on computed levels as follows: “Did not graduate High School,” “Graduated High School,” “Attended College or Technical School,” and “Graduated from College or Technical School.” Responses to “Attended College or Technical School” and “Graduated from College or Technical School” were combined to a variable of “Some college or more.” ¶¶ Employment status included employed for wages or self-employed. Unemployment status included being out of work for ≥1 year, out of work for <1 year, a homemaker, a student, retired, or unable to work. *** Disability was defined as responding “yes” to any of the following questions: “Are you deaf or do you have serious difficulty hearing?,” “Are you blind or do you have serious difficulty seeing, even when wearing glasses?,” “Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, do you have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?,” “Do you have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs?,” “Do you have difficulty dressing or bathing?” and “Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, do you have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor’s office or shopping?” ††† Respondents were classified as reporting behaviors that might increase the risk for HIV transmission if they reported at least one of the following: 1) injection of any drug other than one prescribed in the past year, 2) being treated for a sexually transmitted disease in the past year, 3) having given or received money or drugs in exchange for sex in the past year, 4) had anal sex without a condom in the past year, or 5) had four or more sexual partners in the past year. §§§ Frequent mental distress was based on responses to the question, “Now thinking about your mental health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good?” where ≥14 days was considered frequent mental distress. ¶¶¶ Chronic condition was defined as ever being told by a health care provider that the person had a heart attack, angina, coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension (including gestational hypertension), diabetes (including gestational diabetes), arthritis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, depression, any cancer, or chronic kidney disease. **** Health insurance status was based on responses to the question, “Do you have any kind of health care coverage, including health insurance, prepaid plans such as HMOs, or government plans such as Medicare, or Indian Health Service?” †††† Having a usual health care provider was based on responses to the question, “Do you have one person you think of as your personal doctor or health care provider?” where one or more than one was included. §§§§ States were included that had expanded Medicaid before 2017 or 2019, depending on the year or years each state was included in the BRFSS Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention module survey. https://www.kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/status-of-state-medicaid-expansion-decisions-interactive-map/ Approximately one quarter (25.3%; 95% CI = 19.6–31.0) of pregnant persons who received alcohol screening were offered advice from a health care provider about what level of drinking is harmful or risky to their health (including any amount of drinking during pregnancy), and 12.3% (95% CI = 7.6–17.0) were advised to reduce their intake or quit drinking (Figure). Among pregnant persons who reported being screened during their last health care visit and self-reported current drinking, 28.8% (95% CI = 12.2–45.4) were offered advice about what level of drinking is harmful or risky to health and 16.1% (95% CI = 6.9–25.3) were advised to reduce their alcohol intake or quit drinking. FIGURE Prevalence* of age-standardized alcohol screening and brief intervention † among pregnant persons — Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention module, 23 states and the District of Columbia, 2017 and 2019 § Abbreviation: BRFSS = Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. * With 95% CIs indicated by error bars. † Brief intervention was based on responses to the questions, “Were you offered advice about what level of drinking is harmful or risky for your health?” and “At your last routine checkup, were you advised to reduce or quit your drinking?” These questions are only asked if participants responded “Yes” to the question, “You told me earlier that your last routine checkup was [within the past 2 years]. At that checkup, were you asked in person or on a form if you drink alcohol?” Because of survey design, it could not be determined whether the health care provider screened for alcohol use and gave a brief intervention before or after the patient reported alcohol use, or if the patient was using alcohol at the time of the health care visit. Self-reported current drinking was based on the BRFSS calculated variable of “Adults who reported having had at least one drink of alcohol in the past 30 days.” § Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin. The figure is a bar graph showing the prevalence of age-standardized alcohol screening and brief interventions among pregnant persons in 23 states and the District of Columbia during 2017 and 2019 according to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Alcohol Screening and Brief Intervention Module. Discussion Despite recommendations for universal alcohol screening, approximately 20% of pregnant persons were not screened for alcohol use at their last visit to a primary health care provider, and among those with past 30-day alcohol use, only 16% who were screened were advised by a health care provider to quit drinking or reduce their alcohol use. Some groups of pregnant persons, such as those who did not graduate from high school and those who did not report behaviors that might increase the risk for HIV transmission, reported lower prevalences of screening compared with those who graduated from high school and those who reported behaviors that might increase HIV transmission risk. Screening prevalence was significantly lower among reproductive-aged women who did not have health insurance than among those with any health insurance, indicating that lack of health insurance might interfere with engaging in routine alcohol screening and subsequent interventions. In addition, racial and ethnic disparities in ASBI were observed among reproductive-aged women. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that health care providers conduct a brief intervention with all persons who are pregnant if they report any alcohol use ( 8 ). Approximately one third of pregnant persons who reported being screened during their most recent health care visit and self-reported current drinking received advice about what level of drinking is risky or harmful to health. This represents a missed opportunity for providers to discuss the potential adverse effects of alcohol consumption during pregnancy. Brief interventions can vary in length, can be delivered in a wide variety of health care settings, and can be delivered either in person or electronically. §§§§§§ The findings in this report are subject to at least six limitations. First, BRFSS relies on self-reported responses, which are subject to recall and social desirability biases. Second, not all pregnancies might be recognized at the time of health care visit or survey. Third, BRFSS does not ask for trimester of pregnancy, and although it is recognized that alcohol use varies across pregnancy ( 9 ), brief intervention is warranted irrespective of the timing of alcohol use during pregnancy. Fourth, because of the survey design, it could not be ascertained whether the health care provider screened for alcohol use and gave a brief intervention before or after the patient reported alcohol use, or if the patient was using alcohol at the time of the clinic visit. Fifth, specific sociodemographic subgroups of interest (e.g., veterans and sexual and gender minority groups) were not evaluated because of small sample sizes. Finally, because only jurisdictions that participated in the ASBI module were included, the findings in this report might not be generalizable to other jurisdictions. Despite evidence that ASBI is effective in reducing alcohol use ( 1 ), this analysis indicates that ASBI is underutilized in certain populations of pregnant persons. Although alcohol screening among pregnant persons was high, one in five were not screened. Health care providers face multiple barriers in conducting ASBI ( 10 ); strategies to address these include integrating screenings into electronic health records, increasing reimbursement for ASBI services, implementing electronic ASBI ( 2 ), and developing training and tools for conducting ASBI in both traditional and nontraditional settings ( 3 ). Disparities in brief intervention highlight opportunities for expanding communication with patients who report alcohol consumption during pregnancy about associated risks to prevent and reduce adverse alcohol-associated pregnancy outcomes. Summary What is already known about this topic? Alcohol screening and brief intervention (ASBI) is an evidence-based tool to reduce alcohol consumption in adults, including pregnant persons. What is added by this report? In 2017 and 2019, during their most recent health care visit, 80% of pregnant persons reported being asked about their alcohol use; only 16% of those with past 30-day alcohol consumption were advised by a health care provider to quit or reduce their alcohol use. Disparities in alcohol screening were observed among pregnant persons with lower educational attainment. What are the implications for public health practice? Implementation of recommended ASBI among pregnant persons can help prevent alcohol use or reduce current drinking. Strategies to enhance ASBI include integrating screenings into electronic health records, increasing reimbursement for ASBI services, and development of additional tools including electronic ASBI.