7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A digital media literacy intervention for older adults improves resilience to fake news

      research-article
      ,
      Scientific Reports
      Nature Publishing Group UK
      Psychology, Human behaviour

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Older adults are especially susceptible to fake news online, possibly because they are less digitally literate compared to younger individuals. Interventions for older adults have emerged to improve digital literacy, although there has been little evaluation of their effectiveness in improving older adults’ resilience to fake news. We report the results of a digital literacy intervention for older adults administered during the 2020 U.S. election. The intervention was a 1-hour, self-directed series of interactive modules designed to teach concepts and skills for identifying misinformation online. Consistent with our pre-registered hypothesis, older adults ( M age = 67) in the treatment condition (N = 143) significantly improved their likelihood of accurately discerning fake from true news from 64% pre-intervention to 85% post-intervention. In contrast, older adults in the control condition (N = 238) did not significantly improve (from 55% to 57%). The treated older adults were also more likely to employ strategies for identifying misinformation online compared to pre-intervention and the control group.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          R: a Language and Environment for StatisticalComputing

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election

            The spread of fake news on social media became a public concern in the United States after the 2016 presidential election. We examined exposure to and sharing of fake news by registered voters on Twitter and found that engagement with fake news sources was extremely concentrated. Only 1% of individuals accounted for 80% of fake news source exposures, and 0.1% accounted for nearly 80% of fake news sources shared. Individuals most likely to engage with fake news sources were conservative leaning, older, and highly engaged with political news. A cluster of fake news sources shared overlapping audiences on the extreme right, but for people across the political spectrum, most political news exposure still came from mainstream media outlets.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook

              Fake news sharing in 2016 was rare but significantly more common among older Americans.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                rymoore@stanford.edu
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                9 April 2022
                9 April 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 6008
                Affiliations
                GRID grid.168010.e, ISNI 0000000419368956, Department of Communication, , Stanford University, ; Stanford, CA USA
                Article
                8437
                10.1038/s41598-022-08437-0
                8994776
                35397631
                38a094f7-98ac-48e7-9e41-11a884ed5496
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 29 August 2021
                : 25 February 2022
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Uncategorized
                psychology,human behaviour
                Uncategorized
                psychology, human behaviour

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content301

                Cited by32

                Most referenced authors353