31,085
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    15
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      ‘Decolonising the Medical Curriculum‘: Humanising medicine through epistemic pluralism, cultural safety and critical consciousness

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Decolonising the Curriculum movement in higher education has been steadily gaining momentum, accelerated by recent global events calling for an appraisal of the intersecting barriers of discrimination that ethnic minorities can encounter. While the arts and humanities have been at the forefront of these efforts, medical education has been a ‘late starter’ to the initiative. In this article, we describe the pioneering efforts to decolonise the undergraduate medical curriculum at UCL Medical School (UCLMS), London, by a group of clinician educators and students, with the aim of training emerging doctors to treat diverse patient populations equitably and effectively. Throughout this process, students, faculty and members of the public acted as collaborative ‘agents of change’ in co-producing curricula, prompting the implementation of several changes in the UCLMS curriculum and rubric. Reflecting a shift from a diversity-oriented to a decolonial framework, we outline three scaffolding concepts to frame the process of decolonising the medical curriculum: epistemic pluralism, cultural safety and critical consciousness. While each of these reflect a critical area of power imbalance within medical education, the utility of this framework extends beyond this, and it may be applied to interrogate curricula in other health-related disciplines and the natural sciences. We suggest how the medical curriculum can privilege perspectives from different disciplines to challenge the hegemony of the biomedical outlook in contemporary medicine – and offer space to perspectives traditionally marginalised within a colonial framework. We anticipate that through this process of re-centring, medical students will begin to think more holistically, critically and reflexively about the intersectional inequalities within clinical settings, health systems and society at large, and contribute to humanising the practice of medicine for all parties involved.

          Related collections

          Most cited references173

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine

          G. Engel (1977)
          The dominant model of disease today is biomedical, and it leaves no room within tis framework for the social, psychological, and behavioral dimensions of illness. A biopsychosocial model is proposed that provides a blueprint for research, a framework for teaching, and a design for action in the real world of health care.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            COLONIALITY AND MODERNITY/RATIONALITY

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Impact of weight bias and stigma on quality of care and outcomes for patients with obesity

              The objective of this study was to critically review the empirical evidence from all relevant disciplines regarding obesity stigma in order to (i) determine the implications of obesity stigma for healthcare providers and their patients with obesity and (ii) identify strategies to improve care for patients with obesity. We conducted a search of Medline and PsychInfo for all peer-reviewed papers presenting original empirical data relevant to stigma, bias, discrimination, prejudice and medical care. We then performed a narrative review of the existing empirical evidence regarding the impact of obesity stigma and weight bias for healthcare quality and outcomes. Many healthcare providers hold strong negative attitudes and stereotypes about people with obesity. There is considerable evidence that such attitudes influence person-perceptions, judgment, interpersonal behaviour and decision-making. These attitudes may impact the care they provide. Experiences of or expectations for poor treatment may cause stress and avoidance of care, mistrust of doctors and poor adherence among patients with obesity. Stigma can reduce the quality of care for patients with obesity despite the best intentions of healthcare providers to provide high-quality care. There are several potential intervention strategies that may reduce the impact of obesity stigma on quality of care.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                lre
                London Review of Education
                UCL Press (UK )
                1474-8479
                19 May 2021
                : 19
                : 1
                : e19116
                Affiliations
                [1]University College London, UK
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Email: sarah.wong.15@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2306-291X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2603-2759
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7439-2700
                Article
                10.14324/LRE.19.1.16
                4ca9c88e-f28c-4713-8c27-d329d1263742
                Copyright © 2021 Wong, Gishen and Lokugamage

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 29 August 2020
                : 15 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 2, References: 149, Pages: 23
                Categories
                Special feature article

                Education,Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Educational research & Statistics,General education
                cultural safety,decolonising,medical curriculum,critical consciousness,epistemic pluralism

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log