54
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparing land surface phenology of major European crops as derived from SAR and multispectral data of Sentinel-1 and -2

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The frequent acquisitions of fine spatial resolution imagery (10 m) offered by recent multispectral satellite missions, including Sentinel-2, can resolve single agricultural fields and thus provide crop-specific phenology metrics, a crucial information for crop monitoring. However, effective phenology retrieval may still be hampered by significant cloud cover. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) observations are not restricted by weather conditions, and Sentinel-1 thus ensures more frequent observations of the land surface. However, these data have not been systematically exploited for phenology retrieval so far. In this study, we extracted crop-specific land surface phenology (LSP) from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 of major European crops (common and durum wheat, barley, maize, oats, rape and turnip rape, sugar beet, sunflower, and dry pulses) using ground-truth information from the “Copernicus module” of the Land Use/Cover Area frame statistical Survey (LUCAS) of 2018. We consistently used a single model-fit approach to retrieve LSP metrics on temporal profiles of CR (Cross Ratio, the ratio of the backscattering coefficient VH/VV from Sentinel-1) and NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index from Sentinel-2). Our analysis revealed that LSP retrievals from Sentinel-1 are comparable to those of Sentinel-2, particularly for winter crops. The start of season (SOS) timings, as derived from Sentinel-1 and -2, are significantly correlated (average r of 0.78 for winter and 0.46 for summer crops). The correlation is lower for end of season retrievals (EOS, r of 0.62 and 0.34). Agreement between LSP derived from Sentinel-1 and -2 varies among crop types, ranging from r = 0.89 and mean absolute error MAE = 10 days (SOS of dry pulses) to r = 0.15 and MAE = 53 days (EOS of sugar beet). Observed deviations revealed that Sentinel-1 and -2 LSP retrievals can be complementary; for example for winter crops we found that SAR detected the start of the spring growth while multispectral data is sensitive to the vegetative growth before and during winter. To test if our results correspond reasonably to in-situ data, we compared average crop-specific LSP for Germany to average phenology from ground phenological observations of 2018 gathered from the German Meteorological Service (DWD). Our study demonstrated that both Sentinel-1 and -2 can provide relevant and at times complementary LSP information at field- and crop-level.

          Highlights

          • Crop-specific phenology retrieved from Senetinel-1 and Sentinel-2 time series.

          • European Union wide survey LUCAS exploited to focus on major European crops.

          • Comparable phenology from cross polarization ratio VH/VV and from Sentinel-2 NDVI.

          • Retrieved phenology consistent with ground phenological observation from DWD.

          • Sentinel-1 and -2 provide relevant and at times complementary LSP information.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space

          Bo-Cai Gao (1996)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Remote Sens Environ
                Remote Sens Environ
                Remote Sensing of Environment
                American Elsevier Pub. Co
                0034-4257
                1879-0704
                1 February 2021
                February 2021
                : 253
                : 112232
                Affiliations
                [a ]European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, I-21027 Ispra, VA, Italy
                [b ]University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation, P.O. Box 217, 7500, AE, Enschede, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                Article
                S0034-4257(20)30605-2 112232
                10.1016/j.rse.2020.112232
                7841528
                33536689
                4e8bc6a1-85ad-42d0-a61e-5aa2110b04d2
                © 2020 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 8 June 2020
                : 25 November 2020
                : 30 November 2020
                Categories
                Article

                satellite image time series,land surface phenology,agriculture,crop phenology,sentinel-1,sentinel-2,lucas survey,dwd ground phenological observations,europe

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content494

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors695