1,446
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      UCL Press journals including Archaeology Internation have now moved website.

      You will now find the journal, all publications and submission information, at https://journals.uclpress.co.uk/ai

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Building Bridges Research Project at the London Science Museum: Using an Ethnographic Approach with Under-Represented Visitor Groups

      research-article
      ,
      Archaeology International
      Ubiquity Press

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Qualitative research and case study applications in education

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            “Not Designed for Us”: How Science Museums and Science Centers Socially Exclude Low-Income, Minority Ethnic Groups

            This paper explores how people from low-income, minority ethnic groups perceive and experience exclusion from informal science education (ISE) institutions, such as museums and science centers. Drawing on qualitative data from four focus groups, 32 interviews, four accompanied visits to ISE institutions, and field notes, this paper presents an analysis of exclusion from science learning opportunities during visits alongside participants’ attitudes, expectations, and conclusions about participation in ISE. Participants came from four community groups in central London: a Sierra Leonean group (n = 21), a Latin American group (n = 18), a Somali group (n = 6), and an Asian group (n = 13). Using a theoretical framework based on the work of Bourdieu, the analysis suggests ISE practices were grounded in expectations about visitors’ scientific knowledge, language skills, and finances in ways that were problematic for participants and excluded them from science learning opportunities. It is argued that ISE practices reinforced participants preexisting sense that museums and science centers were “not for us.” The paper concludes with a discussion of the findings in relation to previous research on participation in ISE and the potential for developing more inclusive informal science learning opportunities.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              Participant Observation and Fieldnotes

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                2048-4194
                Archaeology International
                Ubiquity Press
                2048-4194
                14 December 2017
                : 20
                : 1
                : 69-73
                Affiliations
                [-1]UCL Institute of Archaeology, London WC1H 0PY, UK
                Article
                10.5334/ai-356
                5bd90baf-994f-4e5e-a76b-a38944312491
                © 2017 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                Categories
                Research update

                Archaeology,Cultural studies
                Archaeology, Cultural studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log