130
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A bibliometric analysis of natural language processing in medical research

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ,
      BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
      BioMed Central
      The 3rd China Health Information Processing Conference (CHIP 2017)
      24-25 November 2017
      Natural language processing, Medical, Bibliometrics, Statistical characteristics, Scientific collaboration, Thematic discovery and evolution

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Natural language processing (NLP) has become an increasingly significant role in advancing medicine. Rich research achievements of NLP methods and applications for medical information processing are available. It is of great significance to conduct a deep analysis to understand the recent development of NLP-empowered medical research field. However, limited study examining the research status of this field could be found. Therefore, this study aims to quantitatively assess the academic output of NLP in medical research field.

          Methods

          We conducted a bibliometric analysis on NLP-empowered medical research publications retrieved from PubMed in the period 2007–2016. The analysis focused on three aspects. Firstly, the literature distribution characteristics were obtained with a statistics analysis method. Secondly, a network analysis method was used to reveal scientific collaboration relations. Finally, thematic discovery and evolution was reflected using an affinity propagation clustering method.

          Results

          There were 1405 NLP-empowered medical research publications published during the 10 years with an average annual growth rate of 18.39%. 10 most productive publication sources together contributed more than 50% of the total publications. The USA had the highest number of publications. A moderately significant correlation between country’s publications and GDP per capita was revealed. Denny, Joshua C was the most productive author. Mayo Clinic was the most productive affiliation. The annual co-affiliation and co-country rates reached 64.04% and 15.79% in 2016, respectively. 10 main great thematic areas were identified including Computational biology, Terminology mining, Information extraction, Text classification, Social medium as data source, Information retrieval, etc.

          Conclusions

          A bibliometric analysis of NLP-empowered medical research publications for uncovering the recent research status is presented. The results can assist relevant researchers, especially newcomers in understanding the research development systematically, seeking scientific cooperation partners, optimizing research topic choices and monitoring new scientific or technological activities.

          Related collections

          Most cited references55

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Normalized cuts and image segmentation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration.

              M. Newman (2004)
              By using data from three bibliographic databases in biology, physics, and mathematics, respectively, networks are constructed in which the nodes are scientists, and two scientists are connected if they have coauthored a paper. We use these networks to answer a broad variety of questions about collaboration patterns, such as the numbers of papers authors write, how many people they write them with, what the typical distance between scientists is through the network, and how patterns of collaboration vary between subjects and over time. We also summarize a number of recent results by other authors on coauthorship patterns.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                shaylyn_chen@163.com
                hrxie2@gmail.com
                pwang@ouhk.edu.hk
                lzq_lby@163.com
                320227@nau.edu.cn
                haoty@gdufs.edu.cn
                Conference
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Med Inform Decis Mak
                BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6947
                22 March 2018
                22 March 2018
                2018
                : 18
                Issue : Suppl 1 Issue sponsor : Publication of this supplement has not been supported by sponsorship. Information about the source of funding for publication charges can be found in the individual articles. The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no competing interests.
                : 14
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1790 3548, GRID grid.258164.c, College of Economics, , Jinan University, ; Guangzhou, China
                [2 ]Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9430 2093, GRID grid.445014.0, School of Science and Technology, , The Open University of Hong Kong, ; Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8848 7685, GRID grid.411866.c, The Second Clinical Medical College, , Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, ; Guangzhou, China
                [5 ]GRID grid.443514.3, The Research Institute of National Supervision and Audit Law, , Nanjing Audit University, ; Nanjing, China
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2301 6433, GRID grid.440718.e, School of Information Science and Technology, , Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, ; Guangzhou, China
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0368 7397, GRID grid.263785.d, School of Computer, , South China Normal University, ; Guangzhou, China
                Article
                594
                10.1186/s12911-018-0594-x
                5872501
                29589569
                5dda9931-a052-4f32-b417-f34511d7ec03
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                The 3rd China Health Information Processing Conference
                CHIP 2017
                Shenzhen, China
                24-25 November 2017
                History
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Bioinformatics & Computational biology
                natural language processing,medical,bibliometrics,statistical characteristics,scientific collaboration,thematic discovery and evolution

                Comments

                Comment on this article