10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Resource stoichiometry, vegetation type and enzymatic activity control wetlands soil organic carbon in the Herbert River catchment, North-east Queensland.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Wetlands are highly productive ecosystem with great potential to store carbon (C) and retain nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in their soil. Changes in vegetation type and land use can affect organic matter inputs and soil properties. This work aimed to examine how these changes affected elemental stoichiometry and C-, N-, and P- associated enzyme activities and wetland soil organic C stock. We quantified organic C concentrations, and stoichiometric ratios of C, N, and P in total and microbial biomass pools, along with the activities and ratios of C-, N-, and P-associated enzymes for soils of natural coastal wetlands with different vegetation types, namely Melaleuca wetland (Melaleuca spp), mangrove forests (Bruguiera spp), and saline marsh (Eleocharis spp). We also compared these natural wetlands to an adjacent sugarcane plantation to understand the effects of vegetation types. Hypothesis-oriented path analysis was used to explore links between these variables and soil organic C stocks. Tidal forested soils (0-30 cm) had the highest organic C, N, and P contents and potential activities of C-, N-, P- acquiring enzymes, compared with other vegetation types. Mangroves soils had the highest total soil C:N and microbial biomass C:P ratios. Microbial biomass C:P ratios were significantly and positively related to total C:P, while microbial biomass N:P ratios were positively associated with total soil C:P and N:P ratios. Path analysis suggested that soil organic C stock was largely explained by total C:P ratio, microbial biomass N:P ratios, total P content, and the ratio of C- and P-associated enzymes. Different types of wetlands have different soil properties and enzymatic activities, implying their different capacity to store and process C and N. The resource quality and stoichiometry direct influence the organic C stock.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Environ Manage
          Journal of environmental management
          Elsevier BV
          1095-8630
          0301-4797
          Oct 15 2021
          : 296
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Australian Rivers Institute and School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia. Electronic address: l.yao@griffith.edu.au.
          [2 ] Australian Rivers Institute and School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia.
          [3 ] Australian Rivers Institute and School of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, 4111, Australia. Electronic address: c.chen@griffith.edu.au.
          Article
          S0301-4797(21)01245-7
          10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113183
          34229139
          68a1ee42-63ec-40d3-8f8e-bee6b31f1064
          Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
          History

          Stoichiometry,Microbial enzymes,Melaleuca,Coastal wetlands,Carbon stock,Biogeochemistry

          Comments

          Comment on this article

          scite_
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Smart Citations
          0
          0
          0
          0
          Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
          View Citations

          See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

          scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

          Similar content177

          Cited by6