2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Acquisition of Pitjantjatjara Clause Chains

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In Pitjantjatjara, a central Australian Indigenous language, speakers typically describe sequences of actions using clause chaining constructions. While similar constructions are common among the world’s languages, very little is known about how children acquire them. A notable exception are the converb constructions of Turkish, which have been relatively well-studied. The present paper examines the acquisition of Pitjantjatara clause chaining constructions and compares this with the acquisition of Turkish converb constructions. Data is drawn from a naturalistic corpus recorded between 2016 and 2019. The corpus contains over 4000 utterances from 23 children aged between 10 months and 10 years, five of whom are recorded at multiple ages. The corpus also includes approximately 1600 utterances from 21 adults, aged between 16 and 70. Results show that the acquisition of Pitjantjatjara clause chains consists of three stages. Stage 1 features juxtaposition of finite verb forms. In Stage 2, children make regular use of clause chain morphology, but primarily for modification purposes. In Stage 3, clause chains are the preferred strategy for sequential actions as well as modification purposes. The initial use of verb juxtaposition followed by increasing use of dedicated morphology is consistent with findings for Turkish converb acquisition, with speakers of both languages utilizing dedicated forms from around 2;6 onwards. A notable difference between the acquisition of Pitjantjatjara clause chains and Turkish converbs is in the order of acquisition of semantic functions. In Turkish, children acquire temporal functions, such as sequential actions, before modifying functions, such as manner specification. In Pitjantjatjara, the order is reversed, with children first using clause chaining constructions for modification and simultaneous aspects of events before utilizing them to combine sequential actions. This raises questions regarding the distribution and relative timing of event combination and modification strategies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Complex sentences: acquisition of syntactic connectives and the semantic relations they encode.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Computational phylogenetics and the internal structure of Pama-Nyungan

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development of [j] in young, midwestern, American children.

              Beginning at the age of about 14 months, eight children who lived in a rhotic dialect region of the United States were recorded approximately every 2 months interacting with their parents. All were recorded until at least the age of 26 months, and some until the age of 31 months. Acoustic analyses of speech samples indicated that these young children acquired [inverted r] production ability at different ages for [inverted r]'s in different syllable positions. The children, as a group, had started to produce postvocalic and syllabic [inverted r] in an adult-like manner by the end of the recording sessions, but were not yet showing evidence of having acquired prevocalic [inverted r]. Articulatory limitations of young children are posited as a cause for the difference in development of [inverted r] according to syllable position. Specifically, it is speculated that adult-like prevocalic [inverted r] production requires two lingual constrictions: one in the mouth, and the other in the pharynx, while postvocalic and syllabic [inverted r] requires only one oral constriction. Two lingual constrictions could be difficult for young children to produce.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                16 April 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 541
                Affiliations
                Research Unit for Indigenous Language, ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, The University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Hannah Sarvasy, Western Sydney University, Australia

                Reviewed by: Maïa Ponsonnet, The University of Western Australia, Australia; Joe Blythe, Macquarie University, Australia

                *Correspondence: Rebecca Defina, Rebecca.Defina@ 123456unimelb.edu.au

                This article was submitted to Language Sciences, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00541
                7179745
                32372999
                6e40522d-b592-49a2-8ad3-023e4ab52f42
                Copyright © 2020 Defina.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 31 July 2019
                : 06 March 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 7, Equations: 0, References: 42, Pages: 18, Words: 0
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                pitjantjatjara,language acquisition,clause chain,clause combining,converb,australian languages

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                10
                0
                13
                0
                Smart Citations
                10
                0
                13
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content226

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors106