22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Intense Simulation-Based Surgical Education for Manual Small-Incision Cataract Surgery : The Ophthalmic Learning and Improvement Initiative in Cataract Surgery Randomized Clinical Trial in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe

      research-article
      , PhD, MEd, MBChB, BSc 1 , 2 , , , PhD, MBChB, MMed, MBA, MSC(Epid) 3 , , MD, MBBS 1 , , MMEd, MBChB 4 , , MMEd, MBChB 5 , , MMed, MBChB 6 , , PhD, MMed(Oph), MBChB 1 , 7 , , MRCOphth, MBBS 8 , , MSc 9 , , MMed, MBChB 10 , , PhD, MSc 9 , , MBChB, DO, MPH 2 , , PhD, MRCP, DTM&H, MBChB, MA 1 , 11
      JAMA Ophthalmology
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Does the addition of simulation-based surgical education to conventional training improve cataract surgical competence among trainees?

          Findings

          In this randomized clinical trial, a simulation-based training intervention resulted in an almost 3-fold increase in objectively assessed surgical competence of trainees.

          Meaning

          These results support pursuing simulation-based surgical training units, which may lead to safer, more effective, and more efficient surgical skills before trainees progress to conventional live surgical training.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Cataracts account for 40% of cases of blindness globally, with surgery the only treatment.

          Objective

          To determine whether adding simulation-based cataract surgical training to conventional training results in improved acquisition of surgical skills among trainees.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          A multicenter, investigator-masked, parallel-group, randomized clinical educational-intervention trial was conducted at 5 university hospital training institutions in Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zimbabwe from October 1, 2017, to September 30, 2019, with a follow-up of 15 months. Fifty-two trainee ophthalmologists were assessed for eligibility (required no prior cataract surgery as primary surgeon); 50 were recruited and randomized. Those assessing outcomes of surgical competency were masked to group assignment. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

          Interventions

          The intervention group received a 5-day simulation-based cataract surgical training course, in addition to standard surgical training. The control group received standard training only, without a placebo intervention; however, those in the control group received the intervention training after the initial 12-month follow-up period.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          The primary outcome measure was overall surgical competency at 3 months, which was assessed with a validated competency assessment rubric. Secondary outcomes included surgical competence at 1 year and quantity and outcomes (including visual acuity and posterior capsule rupture) of cataract surgical procedures performed during a 1-year period.

          Results

          Among the 50 participants (26 women [52.0%]; mean [SD] age, 32.3 [4.6] years), 25 were randomized to the intervention group, and 25 were randomized to the control group, with 1 dropout. Forty-nine participants were included in the final intention-to-treat analysis. Baseline characteristics were balanced. The participants in the intervention group had higher scores at 3 months compared with the participants in the control group, after adjusting for baseline assessment rubric score. The participants in the intervention group were estimated to have scores 16.6 points (out of 40) higher (95% CI, 14.4-18.7; P < .001) at 3 months than the participants in the control group. The participants in the intervention group performed a mean of 21.5 cataract surgical procedures in the year after the training, while the participants in the control group performed a mean of 8.5 cataract surgical procedures (mean difference, 13.0; 95% CI, 3.9-22.2; P < .001). Posterior capsule rupture rates (an important complication) were 7.8% (42 of 537) for the intervention group and 26.6% (54 of 203) for the control group (difference, 18.8%; 95% CI, 12.3%-25.3%; P < .001).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          This randomized clinical trial provides evidence that intense simulation-based cataract surgical education facilitates the rapid acquisition of surgical competence and maximizes patient safety.

          Trial Registration

          Pan-African Clinical Trial Registry, number PACTR201803002159198

          Abstract

          This randomized clinical trial examines whether adding simulation-based cataract surgical training to conventional training results in improved acquisition of surgical skills among trainees.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

              Contemporary data for causes of vision impairment and blindness form an important basis of recommendations in public health policies. Refreshment of the Global Vision Database with recently published data sources permitted modelling of cause of vision loss data from 1990 to 2015, further disaggregation by cause, and forecasts to 2020.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Ophthalmol
                JAMA Ophthalmol
                JAMA Ophthalmology
                American Medical Association
                2168-6165
                2168-6173
                5 November 2020
                January 2021
                5 November 2020
                : 139
                : 1
                : 9-15
                Affiliations
                [1 ]International Centre for Eye Health, Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Division of Ophthalmology, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
                [3 ]Department of Ophthalmology, University of Nairobi, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
                [4 ]Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Moshi, Tanzania
                [5 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Parirenyatwa Hospitals, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
                [6 ]Department of Ophthalmology, Makerere University School of Medicine, Kampala, Uganda
                [7 ]Mbarara University and Referral Hospital Eye Centre, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
                [8 ]Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, United Kingdom
                [9 ]Tropical Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
                [10 ]Makeni Regional Hospital, Bombali, Sierra Leone
                [11 ]Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: September 21, 2020.
                Published Online: November 5, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.4718
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. © 2020 Dean WH et al. JAMA Ophthalmology.
                Corresponding Author: William H. Dean, PhD, MEd, MBChB, BSc, International Centre for Eye Health, Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom ( will.dean@ 123456lshtm.ac.uk ).
                Author Contributions: Dr Dean had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Dean, Buchan, Otiti-Sengeri, Arunga, Mukherjee, Macleod, Cook, Burton.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Dean, Gichuhi, Buchan, Makupa, Mukome, Arunga, Mukherjee, Kim, Harrison-Williams, Burton.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Dean, Otiti-Sengeri, Arunga, Mukherjee, Harrison-Williams.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Dean, Gichuhi, Buchan, Makupa, Mukome, Mukherjee, Kim, Harrison-Williams, Macleod, Cook, Burton.
                Statistical analysis: Dean, Kim, Macleod.
                Obtained funding: Dean, Burton.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Dean, Gichuhi, Makupa, Arunga, Harrison-Williams, Cook.
                Supervision: Dean, Gichuhi, Buchan, Mukome, Otiti-Sengeri, Arunga, Burton.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: The Trial was funded by the British Council for the Prevention of Blindness, Ulverscroft Foundation, Christian Blind Mission (CBM), L’Occitane Foundation, Orbis International, and Queen Elizabeth Diamond Jubilee Trust. Dr Burton is supported by grant 207472/Z/17/Z from the Wellcome Trust. The trial sponsor was the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding sources had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Data Sharing Statement: See Supplement 2.
                Additional Contributions: Nathan Congdon, MD, MPH, Queen’s University Belfast, reviewed the manuscript. He was not compensated for his contribution.
                Article
                eoi200085
                10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.4718
                7645744
                33151321
                6f9641d1-f46a-42e6-8319-d5057dcfc5ed
                Copyright 2020 Dean WH et al. JAMA Ophthalmology.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.

                History
                : 13 May 2020
                : 21 September 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online First
                Comments

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content63

                Cited by19

                Most referenced authors648