21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of SARS-CoV-2 BA.4/BA.5 Omicron lineages with immune escape and clinical outcome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 BA.4 and BA.5 Omicron subvariants in populations with prevalent immunity from prior infection and vaccination, and associated burden of severe COVID-19, has raised concerns about epidemiologic characteristics of these lineages including their association with immune escape or severe clinical outcomes. Here we show that BA.4/BA.5 cases in a large US healthcare system had at least 55% (95% confidence interval: 43–69%) higher adjusted odds of prior documented infection than time-matched BA.2 cases, as well as 15% (9–21%) and 38% (27–49%) higher adjusted odds of having received 3 and ≥4 COVID-19 vaccine doses, respectively. However, after adjusting for differences in epidemiologic characteristics among cases with each lineage, BA.4/BA.5 infection was not associated with differential risk of emergency department presentation, hospital admission, or intensive care unit admission following an initial outpatient diagnosis. This finding held in sensitivity analyses correcting for potential exposure misclassification resulting from unascertained prior infections. Our results demonstrate that the reduced severity associated with prior (BA.1 and BA.2) Omicron lineages, relative to the Delta variant, has persisted with BA.4/BA.5, despite the association of BA.4/BA.5 with increased risk of breakthrough infection among previously vaccinated or infected individuals.

          Abstract

          Continuous monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 variant properties is important for public health planning. Here, the authors use data from the United States and show that Omicron BA.4/5 subvariants, which became dominant in mid-2022, have stronger immune escape properties, but are no more severe, than the previously dominant BA.2.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Covid-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant

          Background A rapid increase in coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) cases due to the omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in highly vaccinated populations has aroused concerns about the effectiveness of current vaccines. Methods We used a test-negative case–control design to estimate vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease caused by the omicron and delta (B.1.617.2) variants in England. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated after primary immunization with two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech), ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca), or mRNA-1273 (Moderna) vaccine and after a booster dose of BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, or mRNA-1273. Results Between November 27, 2021, and January 12, 2022, a total of 886,774 eligible persons infected with the omicron variant, 204,154 eligible persons infected with the delta variant, and 1,572,621 eligible test-negative controls were identified. At all time points investigated and for all combinations of primary course and booster vaccines, vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease was higher for the delta variant than for the omicron variant. No effect against the omicron variant was noted from 20 weeks after two ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 doses, whereas vaccine effectiveness after two BNT162b2 doses was 65.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63.9 to 67.0) at 2 to 4 weeks, dropping to 8.8% (95% CI, 7.0 to 10.5) at 25 or more weeks. Among ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 primary course recipients, vaccine effectiveness increased to 62.4% (95% CI, 61.8 to 63.0) at 2 to 4 weeks after a BNT162b2 booster before decreasing to 39.6% (95% CI, 38.0 to 41.1) at 10 or more weeks. Among BNT162b2 primary course recipients, vaccine effectiveness increased to 67.2% (95% CI, 66.5 to 67.8) at 2 to 4 weeks after a BNT162b2 booster before declining to 45.7% (95% CI, 44.7 to 46.7) at 10 or more weeks. Vaccine effectiveness after a ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 primary course increased to 70.1% (95% CI, 69.5 to 70.7) at 2 to 4 weeks after an mRNA-1273 booster and decreased to 60.9% (95% CI, 59.7 to 62.1) at 5 to 9 weeks. After a BNT162b2 primary course, the mRNA-1273 booster increased vaccine effectiveness to 73.9% (95% CI, 73.1 to 74.6) at 2 to 4 weeks; vaccine effectiveness fell to 64.4% (95% CI, 62.6 to 66.1) at 5 to 9 weeks. Conclusions Primary immunization with two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 vaccine provided limited protection against symptomatic disease caused by the omicron variant. A BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 booster after either the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 primary course substantially increased protection, but that protection waned over time. (Funded by the U.K. Health Security Agency.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Rapid epidemic expansion of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in southern Africa

            The SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in southern Africa has been characterized by three distinct waves. The first was associated with a mix of SARS-CoV-2 lineages, while the second and third waves were driven by the Beta (B.1.351) and Delta (B.1.617.2) variants, respectively 1–3 . In November 2021, genomic surveillance teams in South Africa and Botswana detected a new SARS-CoV-2 variant associated with a rapid resurgence of infections in Gauteng province, South Africa. Within three days of the first genome being uploaded, it was designated a variant of concern (Omicron, B.1.1.529) by the World Health Organization and, within three weeks, had been identified in 87 countries. The Omicron variant is exceptional for carrying over 30 mutations in the spike glycoprotein, which are predicted to influence antibody neutralization and spike function 4 . Here we describe the genomic profile and early transmission dynamics of Omicron, highlighting the rapid spread in regions with high levels of population immunity.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Broad and strong memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells induced by SARS-CoV-2 in UK convalescent individuals following COVID-19

              The development of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines and therapeutics will depend on understanding viral immunity. We studied T cell memory in 42 patients following recovery from COVID-19 (28 with mild disease and 14 with severe disease) and 16 unexposed donors, using interferon-γ-based assays with peptides spanning SARS-CoV-2 except ORF1. The breadth and magnitude of T cell responses were significantly higher in severe as compared with mild cases. Total and spike-specific T cell responses correlated with spike-specific antibody responses. We identified 41 peptides containing CD4+ and/or CD8+ epitopes, including six immunodominant regions. Six optimized CD8+ epitopes were defined, with peptide-MHC pentamer-positive cells displaying the central and effector memory phenotype. In mild cases, higher proportions of SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T cells were observed. The identification of T cell responses associated with milder disease will support an understanding of protective immunity and highlights the potential of including non-spike proteins within future COVID-19 vaccine design.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jLewnard@berkeley.edu
                Sara.Y.Tartof@kp.org
                Journal
                Nat Commun
                Nat Commun
                Nature Communications
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2041-1723
                14 March 2023
                14 March 2023
                2023
                : 14
                : 1407
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.47840.3f, ISNI 0000 0001 2181 7878, Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, , University of California, Berkeley, ; Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.47840.3f, ISNI 0000 0001 2181 7878, Division of Infectious Diseases & Vaccinology, School of Public Health, , University of California, Berkeley, ; Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.47840.3f, ISNI 0000 0001 2181 7878, Center for Computational Biology, College of Engineering, , University of California, Berkeley, ; Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.280062.e, ISNI 0000 0000 9957 7758, Department of Research & Evaluation, , Kaiser Permanente Southern California, ; Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.19006.3e, ISNI 0000 0000 9632 6718, Department of Health Systems Science, , Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, ; Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8505-8839
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6553-1772
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2336-8476
                Article
                37051
                10.1038/s41467-023-37051-5
                10012300
                36918548
                7764958b-8b53-40f4-b515-811a926891b8
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 2 November 2022
                : 28 February 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100000030, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC);
                Award ID: 75D3-121C11520
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef https://doi.org/10.13039/100006492, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Division of Intramural Research of the NIAID);
                Award ID: R01-AI14812701A1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Uncategorized
                epidemiology,viral infection,sars-cov-2
                Uncategorized
                epidemiology, viral infection, sars-cov-2

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content238

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors1,202