20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Tale of Two Researchers: Commonalities, Complementarities, and Contrasts in an Examination of Mental Computation and Relational Thinking

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This paper describes a research collaboration between an educational psychologist and a mathematics education researcher, namely a didacticien des mathématiques. Our joint project aimed to explore the mental computation strategies of preservice teachers in an elementary mathematics methods course and to investigate the relationship between mental computation and relational thinking. The primary objective of the paper, however, is to go beyond the data and their interpretation. We describe the commonalities, complementarities, and points of contrast that emerged between us as researchers who hail from different disciplines, but who have the same overarching interests in mathematical thinking. In particular, we untangle issues we encountered during our collaboration related to our research questions, methodologies, and epistemological stances. We detail the ways in which we navigated these issues in the context of the research and describe what we learned about our own disciplinary perspectives and each other’s. We conclude by discussing what our story offers as a means of reflecting on our individual fields and potential interactions between them.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer.

            Despite a century's worth of research, arguments surrounding the question of whether far transfer occurs have made little progress toward resolution. The authors argue the reason for this confusion is a failure to specify various dimensions along which transfer can occur, resulting in comparisons of "apples and oranges." They provide a framework that describes 9 relevant dimensions and show that the literature can productively be classified along these dimensions, with each study situated at the intersection of various dimensions. Estimation of a single effect size for far transfer is misguided in view of this complexity. The past 100 years of research shows that evidence for transfer under some conditions is substantial, but critical conditions for many key questions are untested.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Teaching and learning science as argument

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JNC
                J Numer Cogn
                Journal of Numerical Cognition
                J. Numer. Cogn.
                PsychOpen
                2363-8761
                2018
                07 June 2018
                : 4
                : 1
                : 59-83
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Education, Concordia University , Montréal, Canada
                [b ]Laboratoire Épistémologie et Activité Mathématique, Département de mathématiques, Université du Québec à Montréal , Montréal, Canada
                [3]Department of Mathematics, Virginia Tech , Blacksburg, VA, USA
                [4]School of Teaching, Learning, and Curriculum Studies, Kent State University , Kent, OH, USA
                Author notes
                [* ]Department of Education, Concordia University, 1455 de Maisonneuve Blvd. Ouest, Montréal, QC Canada, H3G 1M8. helena.osana@ 123456concordia.ca
                Article
                jnc.v4i1.89
                10.5964/jnc.v4i1.89
                89f8fc0a-f2b7-443d-a37d-d3a9e5c66e90
                Copyright @ 2018

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 October 2016
                : 01 November 2017
                Categories
                Theoretical Contributions

                Psychology
                disciplinary perspectives,educational psychology,mathematics education,didactique des mathématiques,relational thinking,mental computation,epistemology

                Comments

                Comment on this article