24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Protocol of a test of hearing health education programs for farm and rural youth

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Farm and rural youth have frequent exposure to hazardous noise on the farm and recreationally, and have an increased prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss. There is a lack of programs to prepare this high-risk population to use hearing conservation strategies.

          Methods

          The purpose of this project is to test innovative hearing health education programs delivered to a large target group and to determine the effectiveness and sustainability of these programs in promoting hearing health among farm and rural youth. Specifically, this project includes: a) an interactive face-to-face informational program alone, b) an interactive face-to-face informational program followed by an Internet-based booster, and c) a no-intervention control. Sites will include selected affiliates of a major farm youth safety education organization. Data will be collected at baseline, 3, and 12 months. A linear mixed model will be used to compare the effectiveness of the three interventions over time. Descriptive statistics will be used to compare program costs and sustainability ratings.

          Discussion

          Outcomes of this project will provide knowledge necessary to implement quality and cost-effective services to farm and rural youth, a high-risk and underserved population, that can be implemented and sustained after the study is completed.

          Trial registration

          Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02472821 Registered 09 Jun, 2015.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: the cholesterol education and research trial (CEART).

          Cluster randomization trials are increasingly being used in primary care research. The main feature of these trials is that patients are nested within large clusters such as physician practices or communities and the intervention is applied to the cluster. This study design necessitates calculation of intraclass correlation coefficients in order to determine the required sample size. The purpose of this study is to determine intraclass correlation coefficients for a number of outcome measures at the primary care practice level. The CEART study is a randomized trial testing the effectiveness of translating ATP III guidelines into clinical practice, with primary care physician practices as the unit of randomization and patients as the unit of data collection. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was<0.02 and the design effect ranged from 1.0 to 2.3, respectively, for weight, total cholesterol, LDL, non-HDL, glucose, creatinine, and % at non-HDL goal. For smoking status, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol triglycerides, total cholesterol/HDL ratio and % at LDL goal, the ICC was 0.02-0.047 and the design effect was 2.6-4.1. The largest ICCs (0.05-0.12) and design effects (4.4-9.4) were found for height and diastolic blood pressure. These findings suggest that cluster randomization may substantially increase the sample size necessary to maintain adequate statistical power for selected outcomes such as diastolic blood pressure studies compared with simple randomization for most outcomes evaluated in this study where the design effect is small to moderate. Overall, the ICCs presented will be useful in calculating sample sizes at the primary care level.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Healthy People 2020

            U DHHS, U DHHS (2010)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hearing difficulty attributable to employment by industry and occupation: an analysis of the National Health Interview Survey--United States, 1997 to 2003.

              To estimate the national burden of hearing difficulty among workers in US industries and occupations. Data on 130,102 employed National Health Interview Survey respondents between the ages of 18 to 65 years who were interviewed between 1997 and 2003 were analyzed to estimate the population prevalence, adjusted prevalence ratios, and fractions of hearing difficulty attributable to employment. The estimated population prevalence of hearing difficulty was 11.4% (24% attributable to employment). The adjusted prevalence ratios of hearing difficulty were highest for railroads, mining, and primary metal manufacturing industry. Occupations with increased risk of hearing difficulty were mechanics/repairers, machine operators, and transportation equipment operators. Hearing difficulty was differentially distributed across various industries. In industries with high rates, employers and workers should take preventive action to reduce the risk of occupational hearing loss.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                734.763.3450 , mcculla@umich.edu
                tanima@umich.edu
                jiyang@umich.edu
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                16 October 2015
                16 October 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 1061
                Affiliations
                University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6504-5176
                Article
                2393
                10.1186/s12889-015-2393-y
                4609087
                93f501c2-0949-4721-9808-683d8b68a8b7
                © McCullagh et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 11 September 2015
                : 6 October 2015
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Public health
                hearing loss prevention,hearing conservation,farmers,randomized controlled trial
                Public health
                hearing loss prevention, hearing conservation, farmers, randomized controlled trial

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                3
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                3
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content100

                Most referenced authors226