18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Parental childhood vaccine hesitancy and predicting uptake of vaccinations: a systematic review

      research-article
      , ,
      Primary Health Care Research & Development
      Cambridge University Press
      childhood vaccines, confidence, immunisation, hesitancy, parents, public trust, vaccination, vaccine

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim:

          This review aims are to (1) identify relevant quantitative research on parental childhood vaccine hesitancy with vaccine uptake and vaccination intention being relevant outcomes and (2) map the gaps in knowledge on vaccine hesitancy to develop suggestions for further research and to guide interventions in this field.

          Background:

          Vaccine hesitancy recognises a continuum between vaccine acceptance and vaccine refusal, de-polarising past anti-vaccine, and pro-vaccine categorisations of individuals and groups. Vaccine hesitancy poses a serious challenge to international efforts to lessen the burden of vaccine-preventable diseases. Potential vaccination barriers must be identified to inform initiatives aimed at increasing vaccine awareness, acceptance, and uptake.

          Methods:

          Five databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between 1998 and 2020 in the fields of medicine, nursing, public health, biological sciences, and social sciences. Across these datasets, a comprehensive search technique was used to identify multiple variables of public trust, confidence, and hesitancy about vaccines. Using PRISMA guidelines, 34 papers were included so long as they focused on childhood immunisations, employed multivariate analysis, and were published during the time frame. Significant challenges to vaccine uptake or intention were identified in these studies. Barriers to vaccination for the target populations were grouped using conceptual frameworks based on the Protection Motivation Theory and the World Health Organization’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization Working Group model and explored using the 5C psychological antecedents of vaccination.

          Findings:

          Although several characteristics were shown to relate to vaccine hesitancy, they do not allow for a thorough classification or proof of their individual and comparative level of influence. Understudied themes were also discovered during the review. Lack of confidence, complacency, constraints, calculation, and collective responsibility have all been highlighted as barriers to vaccination uptake among parents to different degrees.

          Related collections

          Most cited references119

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants.

          The SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy concluded that vaccine hesitancy refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services. Vaccine hesitancy is complex and context specific, varying across time, place and vaccines. It is influenced by factors such as complacency, convenience and confidence. The Working Group retained the term 'vaccine' rather than 'vaccination' hesitancy, although the latter more correctly implies the broader range of immunization concerns, as vaccine hesitancy is the more commonly used term. While high levels of hesitancy lead to low vaccine demand, low levels of hesitancy do not necessarily mean high vaccine demand. The Vaccine Hesitancy Determinants Matrix displays the factors influencing the behavioral decision to accept, delay or reject some or all vaccines under three categories: contextual, individual and group, and vaccine/vaccination-specific influences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data.

            There currently does not exist guidance for authors aiming to undertake systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies, such as those reporting prevalence and incidence information. These reviews are particularly useful to measure global disease burden and changes in disease over time. The aim of this article is to provide guidance for conducting these types of reviews.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A Protection Motivation Theory of Fear Appeals and Attitude Change1

              A protection motivation theory is proposed that postulates the three crucial components of a fear appeal to be (a) the magnitude of noxiousness of a depicted event; (b) the probability of that event's occurrence; and (c) the efficacy of a protective response. Each of these communication variables initiates corresponding cognitive appraisal processes that mediate attitude change. The proposed conceptualization is a special case of a more comprehensive theoretical schema: expectancy-value theories. Several suggestions are offered for reinterpreting existing data, designing new types of empirical research, and making future studies more comparable. Finally, the principal advantages of protection motivation theory over the rival formulations of Janis and Leventhal are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Prim Health Care Res Dev
                Prim Health Care Res Dev
                PHC
                Primary Health Care Research & Development
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                1463-4236
                1477-1128
                2022
                04 November 2022
                : 23
                : e68
                Affiliations
                University of Sunderland , Sunderland, UK
                Author notes
                Author for correspondence: Dr Kennedy Obohwemu, Faculty of Health Science & Wellbeing, University of Sunderland , Chester Road, SR1 3SD, Sunderland, UK. Phone: +447570173055. Emails: kennedy.obohwemu@ 123456sunderland.ac.uk , penkupfamily@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5175-1179
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5275-8030
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2932-4474
                Article
                S1463423622000512
                10.1017/S1463423622000512
                9641700
                36330835
                9482b794-4cc9-44f4-8171-35499519a0a9
                © The Author(s) 2022

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 March 2022
                : 01 August 2022
                : 03 September 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 5, References: 123, Pages: 14
                Categories
                Research Article

                childhood vaccines,confidence,immunisation,hesitancy,parents,public trust,vaccination,vaccine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                22
                0
                17
                0
                Smart Citations
                22
                0
                17
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content341

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors2,780