9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Anxiety and Depression Symptoms Among Farmers: The HUNT Study, Norway

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Agriculture has undergone profound changes, and farmers face a wide variety of stressors. Our aim was to study the levels of anxiety and depression symptoms among Norwegian farmers compared with other occupational groups. Working participants in the HUNT3 Survey (The Nord-Trøndelag Health Study, 2006–2008), aged 19–66.9 years, were included in this cross-sectional study. We compared farmers (women, n = 317; men, n = 1,100) with HUNT3 participants working in other occupational groups (women, n = 13,429; men, n = 10,026), classified according to socioeconomic status. We used the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to measure anxiety and depression symptoms. Both male and female farmers had higher levels of depression symptoms than the general working population, but the levels of anxiety symptoms did not differ. The differences in depression symptom levels between farmers and the general working population increased with age. In an age-adjusted logistic regression analysis, the odds ratio (OR) for depression caseness (HADS-D ≥8) when compared with the general working population was 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22–1.83) in men and 1.29 (95% CI: 0.85–1.95) in women. Male farmers had a higher OR of depression caseness than any other occupational group (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.52–2.49, using higher-grade professionals as reference). Female farmers had an OR similar to men (2.00, 95% CI: 1.26–3.17), but lower than other manual occupations. We found that farmers had high levels of depression symptoms and average levels of anxiety symptoms compared with other occupational groups.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The three worlds of welfare capitalism

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The HUNT study: participation is associated with survival and depends on socioeconomic status, diseases and symptoms

            Background Population based studies are important for prevalence, incidence and association studies, but their external validity might be threatened by decreasing participation rates. The 50 807 participants in the third survey of the HUNT Study (HUNT3, 2006-08), represented 54% of the invited, necessitating a nonparticipation study. Methods Questionnaire data from HUNT3 were compared with data collected from several sources: a short questionnaire to nonparticipants, anonymous data on specific diagnoses and prescribed medication extracted from randomly selected general practices, registry data from Statistics Norway on socioeconomic factors and mortality, and from the Norwegian Prescription Database on drug consumption. Results Participation rates for HUNT3 depended on age, sex and type of symptoms and diseases, but only small changes were found in the overall prevalence estimates when including data from 6922 nonparticipants. Among nonparticipants, the prevalences of cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and psychiatric disorders were higher both in nonparticipant data and data extracted from general practice, compared to that reported by participants, whilst the opposite pattern was found, at least among persons younger than 80 years, for urine incontinence, musculoskeletal pain and headache. Registry data showed that the nonparticipants had lower socioeconomic status and a higher mortality than participants. Conclusion Nonparticipants had lower socioeconomic status, higher mortality and showed higher prevalences of several chronic diseases, whilst opposite patterns were found for common problems like musculoskeletal pain, urine incontinence and headache. The impact on associations should be analyzed for each diagnosis, and data making such analyses possible are provided in the present paper.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Farming and mental health problems and mental illness.

              Farmers experience one of the highest rates of suicide of any industry and there is growing evidence that those involved in farming are at higher risk of developing mental health problems. This article provides an overview of the literature examining mental health issues experienced by farming populations in the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia, Canada and the United States and identifies areas for further research. A literature review (Medline, Science Direct, Ingenta, Proquest and PsychINFO) was carried out using the words 'farmers', 'agriculture', 'depression', 'mental health', 'mental illness', 'stress', and 'suicide', as well as a review of relevant papers and publications known to the authors. (Papers not written in English and those published prior to 1985 were excluded.) Fifty-two papers were identified with the majority focusing on stress and coping styles in farmers (24). A number of studies also focused on neuropsychological functioning and agricultural chemical use (7), depression (7), suicide (9), general mental health (4) and injury and mental health (1). This body of research studied male farmers, female farmers, farm workers, farming families, and young people living on farms. Research to date indicates that farmers, farm workers and their respective families face an array of stressors related to the physical environment, structure of farming families and the economic difficulties and uncertainties associated with farming which may be detrimental to their mental health. Whilst suicide rates in some groups of farmers are higher than the general population, conclusive data do not exist to indicate whether farmers and farming families experience higher rates of mental health problems compared with the non-farming community. It is clear, however, that farming is associated with a unique set of characteristics that is potentially hazardous to mental health and requires further research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Agromedicine
                J Agromedicine
                WAGR
                wagr20
                Journal of Agromedicine
                Taylor & Francis
                1059-924X
                1545-0813
                2 January 2016
                13 January 2016
                : 21
                : 1
                : 24-33
                Affiliations
                [ a ]HUNT Research Center, Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) , Levanger, Norway
                [ b ]Department of Public Health and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, the Norwegian University of Science and Technology , Trondheim, Norway
                [ c ]Department of Occupational Medicine, St. Olav’s Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital , Trondheim, Norway
                [ d ]Danish Ramazzini Center, Department of Occupational Medicine, Regional Hospital West Jutland, University Research Clinic , Herning, Denmark
                [ e ]Department of Work Science, Business Economics and Environmental Psychology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences , Alnarp, Sweden
                [ f ]Psychiatric Department, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Health Trust , Norway
                Author notes
                CONTACT Magnhild Oust Torske magnhild.o.torske@ 123456ntnu.no HUNT Research Center , Forskningsvegen 2, 7600 Levanger, Norway.
                Article
                1106375
                10.1080/1059924X.2015.1106375
                4720047
                26488439
                989f6b5d-f309-4764-8d62-3429f0fc9805
                Published with license by Taylor & Francis.

                This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, References: 39, Pages: 10
                Funding
                Funded by: Research Levy on Agricultural Products/the Agricultural Agreement Research Fund, Norway.
                The project was funded by the Research Levy on Agricultural Products/the Agricultural Agreement Research Fund, Norway. The funders had no involvement in study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to publish. Ethics approval: All participants of HUNT3 provided written informed consent. The HUNT Study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REC Central), as was the present study (2012/1359).
                Categories
                Article
                Original Research

                agricultural workers,anxiety,cross-sectional studies,depression,socioeconomic factors

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content841

                Cited by30

                Most referenced authors633