20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors influencing the formation of balanced care teams: the organisation, performance, and perception of nursing care teams and the link with patient outcomes: a systematic scoping review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The composition of care teams is crucial for delivering patient-centered healthcare, yet assembling a well-balanced team remains a challenge. This difficulty stems from the intricate dynamics of team capacity, culture, context, and the demands of the job. The current literature offers limited guidance for decision-makers on how to effectively navigate these dynamics to compose a balanced care team.

          Methods

          We conducted a systematic scoping review of literature spanning from 2009 to 2022. The aim was to identify factors that significantly influence the work environment, team performance, nursing outcomes, and patient outcomes within healthcare settings. Our review focused on extracting and synthesizing evidence to uncover these influencing factors.

          Results

          Our analysis identified 35 factors that play a significant role in shaping the work environment and influencing team performance, nursing outcomes, and patient outcomes. These factors were categorized into nine key domains: workload, leadership, team composition, stress and demands, professional relationships, safety, logistics and ergonomics, autonomy and responsibility, and transparency and task clearness.

          Conclusions

          To improve patient care and nursing job satisfaction, policymakers and decision-makers can consider these influencing factors in the design and management of care teams. The findings advocate for strategic adjustments in these domains to enhance a team’s balance. Furthermore, our review underscores the need for further research to fill the identified gaps in knowledge, offering a directive for future studies into optimal care team composition. This systematic approach to team composition can significantly impact patient outcomes and nurse satisfaction, providing a roadmap for creating more effective and harmonious teams.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-024-11625-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references69

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

          Scoping reviews, a type of knowledge synthesis, follow a systematic approach to map evidence on a topic and identify main concepts, theories, sources, and knowledge gaps. Although more scoping reviews are being done, their methodological and reporting quality need improvement. This document presents the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist and explanation. The checklist was developed by a 24-member expert panel and 2 research leads following published guidance from the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network. The final checklist contains 20 essential reporting items and 2 optional items. The authors provide a rationale and an example of good reporting for each item. The intent of the PRISMA-ScR is to help readers (including researchers, publishers, commissioners, policymakers, health care providers, guideline developers, and patients or consumers) develop a greater understanding of relevant terminology, core concepts, and key items to report for scoping reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Evaluating the quality of medical care. 1966.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                senne.vleminckx@uantwerpen.be
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                27 September 2024
                27 September 2024
                2024
                : 24
                : 1129
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Centre for Research and Innovation in Care (CRIC), Department of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences, University of Antwerp, ( https://ror.org/008x57b05) Universiteitsplein 1, Wilrijk, 2610 Belgium
                [2 ]Faculty of Business and Economics - Management Department, University of Antwerp, ( https://ror.org/008x57b05) Antwerp, Belgium
                [3 ]Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), University of Antwerp, ( https://ror.org/008x57b05) Antwerp, Belgium
                [4 ]Centre for Health Economics Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases (CHERMID), University of Antwerp, ( https://ror.org/008x57b05) Antwerp, Belgium
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9647-4785
                Article
                11625
                10.1186/s12913-024-11625-5
                11429156
                39334182
                98a949ba-448b-497a-8448-57d285b8f0c0
                © The Author(s) 2024

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

                History
                : 4 July 2023
                : 20 September 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007660, Universiteit Antwerpen;
                Categories
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                © BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024

                Health & Social care
                workforce planning,nursing administration research,hospital information system,data-driven healthcare,work environment,nursing outcomes,team performance,patient outcomes.

                Comments

                Comment on this article