40
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Lay economic reasoning: An integrative review and call to action

      1 , 2
      Consumer Psychology Review
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Consumer psychology refers to how people think and act within an economic role in market exchange. However, we know little about how consumers actually perceive these roles, or how they understand markets and economic activity more broadly. That is, we lack an understanding of the economic reasoning of non‐expert consumers, how it departs from formal economic reasoning, and why. The current paper is intended to address this gap. We provide an integrative review of research on lay economic reasoning that consistently reveals how differently lay consumers and economists think about markets. We propose a unifying mental model to explain these divergences. Suggest why it is reinforced by what lay consumers observe (and do not observe) through firsthand marketplace experience, and note its potential evolutionary basis. We then highlight how understanding lay economic reasoning can not only help explain a wide array of marketplace phenomena, but also provide a novel lens to help advance, generate, and better integrate theory across many active literatures within consumer psychology. Without markets, there are no consumers and there is no marketing. We therefore call for consumer psychologists to take ownership of the study of lay economic reasoning and make markets more central to marketing scholarship.

          Related collections

          Most cited references330

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

            This article described three heuristics that are employed in making judgements under uncertainty: (i) representativeness, which is usually employed when people are asked to judge the probability that an object or event A belongs to class or process B; (ii) availability of instances or scenarios, which is often employed when people are asked to assess the frequency of a class or the plausibility of a particular development; and (iii) adjustment from an anchor, which is usually employed in numerical prediction when a relevant value is available. These heuristics are highly economical and usually effective, but they lead to systematic and predictable errors. A better understanding of these heuristics and of the biases to which they lead could improve judgements and decisions in situations of uncertainty.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Consumer Psychology Review
                Consumer Psychology Review
                Wiley
                2476-1273
                2476-1281
                January 21 2024
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Leeds School of Business University of Colorado Boulder Boulder Colorado USA
                [2 ] Yale School of Management Yale University New Haven Connecticut USA
                Article
                10.1002/arcp.1096
                9c91829d-e89e-42a8-a289-7789abccd781
                © 2024

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article