11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparative Measurement of Citizens’ Perceptions of Local Policies: A 3MC (Multinational, Multicultural, Multiregional) Approach

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Comparative social policy research continues to face considerable methodological challenges. Scholars particularly struggle to capture sub-national policy variation in comparatively reliable ways, including subjective perceptions of local policies. Local-level variation increases the need for conceptual and methodological attention to comparability across differing national, cultural, and linguistic settings. The article outlines a conceptually grounded approach relying on the 3MC (multinational, multicultural, multiregional) method to measure and compare individual perceptions of local policies cross-nationally. Often applied in cross-national survey research, a 3MC approach can help address methodological challenges inherent in comparative policy research and improve cross-national studies of local policy differences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references53

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Towards an Integrated Analysis of Bias in Cross-Cultural Assessment

          A central methodological aspect of cross-cultural assessment is the interpretability of intergroup differences: Do scores obtained by subjects from different cultural groups have the same psychological meaning? Equivalence (or the absence of bias) is required in making valid cross-cultural comparisons. As cross-cultural comparisons are becoming increasingly popular and important, the problem of bias and its detection is receiving increased attention from researchers. Three kinds of bias are discussed and illustrated, namely construct bias, method bias, and item bias (or differential item functioning). Methods to identify bias are reviewed. An overview is given of common sources of each kind of bias. It is argued that an integrated treatment of all forms of bias is needed to enhance the validity of cross-cultural comparisons. The predominant focus on item bias techniques has the unfortunate implication that construct and method bias are examined insufficiently.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bias and Equivalence in Cross-Cultural Research

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Inequality reexamined

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Comp Policy Anal
                J Comp Policy Anal
                Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis
                Routledge
                1387-6988
                1572-5448
                12 July 2024
                2024
                12 July 2024
                : 26
                : 5
                : 448-465
                Affiliations
                [* ]Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University; , Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [** ]Department of Methods and Statistics, Utrecht University; , Utrecht, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence Address: Mara A. Yerkes, Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Email: M.A.Yerkes@ 123456uu.nl
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5480-4878
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8160-556X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3845-9867
                Article
                2362712
                10.1080/13876988.2024.2362712
                11418905
                39318858
                a717ab48-b638-49a5-bc6c-311b5a14ab48
                © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 1, References: 58, Pages: 18
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Article

                3mc approach,comparative social policy,local policy,subjective policy perceptions,survey research,social sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content58

                Most referenced authors498