13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ethical Guidance in Human Paleogenomics: New and Ongoing Perspectives

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Over the past two decades, the study of ancient genomes from Ancestral humans, or human paleogenomic research, has expanded rapidly in both scale and scope. Ethical discourse has subsequently emerged to address issues of social responsibility and scientific robusticity in conducting research. Here, we highlight and contextualize the primary sources of professional ethical guidance aimed at paleogenomic researchers. We describe the tension among existing guidelines, while addressing core issues such as consent, destructive research methods, and data access and management. Currently, there is a dissonance between guidelines that focus on scientific outcomes and those that hold scientists accountable to stakeholder communities, such as descendants. Thus, we provide additional tools to navigate the complexities of ancient DNA research while centering engagement with stakeholder communities in the scientific process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references151

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

          (2013)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

            There is an urgent need to improve the infrastructure supporting the reuse of scholarly data. A diverse set of stakeholders—representing academia, industry, funding agencies, and scholarly publishers—have come together to design and jointly endorse a concise and measureable set of principles that we refer to as the FAIR Data Principles. The intent is that these may act as a guideline for those wishing to enhance the reusability of their data holdings. Distinct from peer initiatives that focus on the human scholar, the FAIR Principles put specific emphasis on enhancing the ability of machines to automatically find and use the data, in addition to supporting its reuse by individuals. This Comment is the first formal publication of the FAIR Principles, and includes the rationale behind them, and some exemplar implementations in the community.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                100911346
                26795
                Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet
                Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet
                Annual review of genomics and human genetics
                1527-8204
                1545-293X
                15 October 2024
                31 August 2022
                10 May 2022
                19 December 2024
                : 23
                : 627-652
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
                [2 ]Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA
                [3 ]Sealaska Heritage Institute, Juneau, Alaska, USA
                [4 ]Native BioData Consortium, Eagle Butte, South Dakota, USA
                [5 ]College of Arts and Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
                [6 ]School of Engineering Design, Technology, and Professional Programs; Institute for Computational and Data Sciences; Department of Biomedical Engineering; and Rock Ethics Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
                [7 ]Division of Biomedical Informatics and Personalized Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
                [8 ]Institute for Society and Genetics, Institute for Precision Health, and Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
                Author notes
                [*]

                These authors contributed equally to this article

                Article
                NIHMS2027408
                10.1146/annurev-genom-120621-090239
                11657320
                35537469
                a86b7cf6-572e-45d5-9e94-fbeae1170512

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See credit lines of images or other third-party material in this article for license information

                History
                Categories
                Article

                ethics,paleogenomics,ancient dna,consent,indigenous,stakeholders

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content448

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors1,773