13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing Changes in Anxiety, Empowerment, Stigma and Wellbeing in Participants Attending an Online-Based Recovery College in Quebec During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Pre-Experimental Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives: The present study aims to evaluate the effect of an online Recovery College (RC) program implemented in Quebec (Canada) during the COVID-19 pandemic. From October 2020 to June 2021, 27 training groups were conducted with a total of 362 attendees.

          Methods: Outcome was evaluated using a single group repeated measure design, assessing participants prior the training (T0), after the training (T1) and at follow up (T2). 107 learners of the Quebec RC program attended three two-hour sessions agreed to participate to the research.

          Results: Overall findings show at T1 a small but statistically significant reduction of anxiety and increase in empowerment, and below threshold reduction of stigmatizing attitudes and increase of wellbeing. Conversely, the medium-term changes at follow up were non-significant for all the outcome dimension except for anxiety.

          Conclusion: Findings suggest that the RC online program can be considered as a potential effective strategy to support self-regulation and empowerment of individuals and to reduce anxiety in the context of crisis for the general population.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7.

            Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders; however, there is no brief clinical measure for assessing GAD. The objective of this study was to develop a brief self-report scale to identify probable cases of GAD and evaluate its reliability and validity. A criterion-standard study was performed in 15 primary care clinics in the United States from November 2004 through June 2005. Of a total of 2740 adult patients completing a study questionnaire, 965 patients had a telephone interview with a mental health professional within 1 week. For criterion and construct validity, GAD self-report scale diagnoses were compared with independent diagnoses made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability days; and health care use. A 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7) had good reliability, as well as criterion, construct, factorial, and procedural validity. A cut point was identified that optimized sensitivity (89%) and specificity (82%). Increasing scores on the scale were strongly associated with multiple domains of functional impairment (all 6 Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey scales and disability days). Although GAD and depression symptoms frequently co-occurred, factor analysis confirmed them as distinct dimensions. Moreover, GAD and depression symptoms had differing but independent effects on functional impairment and disability. There was good agreement between self-report and interviewer-administered versions of the scale. The GAD-7 is a valid and efficient tool for screening for GAD and assessing its severity in clinical practice and research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019

              Key Points Question What factors are associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers in China who are treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 1257 health care workers in 34 hospitals equipped with fever clinics or wards for patients with COVID-19 in multiple regions of China, a considerable proportion of health care workers reported experiencing symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, and distress, especially women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers directly engaged in diagnosing, treating, or providing nursing care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. Meaning These findings suggest that, among Chinese health care workers exposed to COVID-19, women, nurses, those in Wuhan, and front-line health care workers have a high risk of developing unfavorable mental health outcomes and may need psychological support or interventions.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Int J Public Health
                Int J Public Health
                Int J Public Health
                International Journal of Public Health
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1661-8556
                1661-8564
                24 June 2022
                2022
                24 June 2022
                : 67
                : 1604735
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Centre de Recherche de l’Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal , Montréal, QC, Canada
                [2] 2 Département d’Ergothérapie , Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières , Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
                [3] 3 Departement of Family Medicine, Centre de Recherche du CHUM , Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal , QC, Canada
                [4] 4 Groupe de Recherche Loricorps , Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières , Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
                [5] 5 Department of Rehabilitation , Faculty of Medicine , Laval University , Québec, QC, Canada
                [6] 6 VITAM Research Centre on Sustainable Health , Laval University , Québec, QC, Canada
                [7] 7 Cervo Brain Research Centre , Laval University , Laval, QC, Canada
                [8] 8 École de Réadaptation , Faculté de Médecine , Université de Montréal , Montréal, QC, Canada
                [9] 9 Office for Continuing Professional Development , Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , McGill University , Montréal, QC, Canada
                Author notes

                Edited by: Gonzalo Martinez-Ales, Columbia University, United States

                Reviewed by: Titiksha Sirari, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), India

                Roberto Mediavilla, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain

                *Correspondence: Catherine Briand, Catherine.Briand@ 123456uqtr.ca

                This Original Article is part of the IJPH Special Issue “The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Mental Health”

                Article
                1604735
                10.3389/ijph.2022.1604735
                9263090
                35814737
                aef04e61-cfea-4c61-8f63-ddf1b2f50f1f
                Copyright © 2022 Rapisarda, Macario de Medeiros, Briand, Boivin, Monthuy-Blanc, Vallée, Drolet, Vachon and Luconi.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 28 December 2021
                : 18 May 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Canadian Institutes of Health Research , doi 10.13039/501100000024;
                Categories
                Public Health Archive
                Original Article

                Public health
                anxiety,covid 19 pandemic,program evaluation,mental health and wellbeing,recovery college,recovery,online-based

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content240

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors727