22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Illiberal Abuse of Constitutional Courts in Europe

      European Constitutional Law Review
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Legal constitutionalism – Political constitutionalism – Emergence of illiberal constitutionalism as a tertium genus – Examination of constitutional courts under three illiberal governments: Poland, Hungary, and Turkey – Illiberal governments’ strategies to seize control of constitutional courts – Illiberal governments’ aim to secure leverage over constitutional judges and restrict the powers of review of the court – Constitutional courts under illiberal rule invert the traditional functions that were assigned to them under the original Kelsenian approach – Instead of a check on power, illiberal constitutional courts become a device to circumvent constitutional constraints and concentrate power in the hands of the ruling actors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Core of the Case against Judicial Review

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union

            R. Kelemen (2017)
            This article argues for a radical recasting of the European Union democratic deficit debate. Critics have long argued that the EU suffers from a democratic deficit and that growing EU power undermines national democracy. But recent backsliding on democracy and the rule of law in Hungary and Poland reminds us that grave democratic deficits can also exist at the national level in member states and that the EU may have a role in addressing them. This article will place the EU’s struggles with democratic deficits in its member states in comparative perspective, drawing on the experience of other democracies that have struggled with pockets of subnational authoritarianism. Comparative analysis suggests that considerations driven by partisan politics may allow local pockets of autocracy to persist within otherwise democratic political unions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              China's Long March toward Rule of Law

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                European Constitutional Law Review
                European Constitutional Law Review
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                1574-0196
                1744-5515
                March 2019
                May 08 2019
                March 2019
                : 15
                : 1
                : 48-72
                Article
                10.1017/S1574019619000026
                b21776eb-3f2f-40a4-99da-989cc61b5219
                © 2019

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article