18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Position statement on genuine physiotherapy research at German university hospitals Translated title: Positionspapier zur genuinen physiotherapeutischen Forschung an den deutschen Universitätskliniken

      discussion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In addition to patient care, physiotherapy is increasingly important in research at university hospitals. Genuine physiotherapy research plays a decisive role in this. This position statement describes the opportunities, benefits, framework conditions, challenges, and research priorities of genuine physiotherapy research at German university hospitals.

          Translated abstract

          Die angehende Profession Physiotherapie nimmt neben der Patient:innenversorgung zunehmend eine wichtige Funktion in der Forschung im universitätsklinischen Setting ein. Die Entwicklung einer genuinen physiotherapeutischen Forschung spielt dabei eine entscheidende Rolle. Im Positionspapier werden Chancen und Nutzen, Rahmenbedingungen und Herausforderungen sowie Forschungsprioritäten der genuinen physiotherapeutischen Forschung an den deutschen Universitätskliniken dargestellt.

          Related collections

          Most cited references83

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process.

            Implementation science is growing in importance among funders, researchers, and practitioners as an approach to bridging the gap between science and practice. We addressed three goals to contribute to the understanding of the complex and dynamic nature of implementation. Our first goal was to provide a conceptual overview of the process of implementation by synthesizing information from 25 implementation frameworks. The synthesis extends prior work by focusing on specific actions (i.e., the "how to") that can be employed to foster high quality implementation. The synthesis identified 14 critical steps that were used to construct the Quality Implementation Framework (QIF). These steps comprise four QIF phases: Initial Considerations Regarding the Host Setting, Creating a Structure for Implementation, Ongoing Structure Once Implementation Begins, and Improving Future Applications. Our second goal was to summarize research support for each of the 14 QIF steps and to offer suggestions to direct future research efforts. Our third goal was to outline practical implications of our findings for improving future implementation efforts in the world of practice. The QIF's critical steps can serve as a useful blueprint for future research and practice. Applying the collective guidance synthesized by the QIF to the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation (ISF) emphasizes that accountability for quality implementation does not rest with the practitioner Delivery System alone. Instead, all three ISF systems are mutually accountable for quality implementation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Sicily statement on evidence-based practice

              Background A variety of definitions of evidence-based practice (EBP) exist. However, definitions are in themselves insufficient to explain the underlying processes of EBP and to differentiate between an evidence-based process and evidence-based outcome. There is a need for a clear statement of what Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) means, a description of the skills required to practise in an evidence-based manner and a curriculum that outlines the minimum requirements for training health professionals in EBP. This consensus statement is based on current literature and incorporating the experience of delegates attending the 2003 Conference of Evidence-Based Health Care Teachers and Developers ("Signposting the future of EBHC"). Discussion Evidence-Based Practice has evolved in both scope and definition. Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) requires that decisions about health care are based on the best available, current, valid and relevant evidence. These decisions should be made by those receiving care, informed by the tacit and explicit knowledge of those providing care, within the context of available resources. Health care professionals must be able to gain, assess, apply and integrate new knowledge and have the ability to adapt to changing circumstances throughout their professional life. Curricula to deliver these aptitudes need to be grounded in the five-step model of EBP, and informed by ongoing research. Core assessment tools for each of the steps should continue to be developed, validated, and made freely available. Summary All health care professionals need to understand the principles of EBP, recognise EBP in action, implement evidence-based policies, and have a critical attitude to their own practice and to evidence. Without these skills, professionals and organisations will find it difficult to provide 'best practice'.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ger Med Sci
                Ger Med Sci
                GMS Ger Med Sci
                GMS German Medical Science
                German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
                1612-3174
                27 May 2024
                2024
                : 22
                : Doc06
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Physiotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
                [3 ]Department for Physical Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
                [4 ]Department of Therapeutic Health Professions, University Hospital Münster, Germany
                [5 ]Physical Therapy, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Orthopedics, University Hospital rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany
                [6 ]Central Department of Physiotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany
                [7 ]Institute for Physiotherapy, University Medical Center Essen, Germany
                [8 ]Central Physiotherapy Department, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany
                [9 ]Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany
                [10 ]Therapy Center, University Hospital Oldenburg AöR, Oldenburg, Germany
                [11 ]Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Germany
                [12 ]Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, University Hospital Augsburg, Germany
                [13 ]Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Germany
                [14 ]Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany
                [15 ]Department of Physiotherapy, Ergotherapy, Logopedics and Physical Therapy, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Germany
                [16 ]Department of Physiotherapy, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
                [17 ]Central Facility for Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Leipzig University Hospital AöR, Leipzig, Germany
                [18 ]Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
                [19 ]Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
                Author notes
                *To whom correspondence should be addressed: Susanne G. R. Klotz, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany, E-mail: s.klotz@ 123456uke.de
                Article
                000332 Doc06 urn:nbn:de:0183-0003322
                10.3205/000332
                11176936
                38883338
                b4ef088a-d28d-41e8-a643-2d6cd77ca66f
                Copyright © 2024 Klotz et al.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 23 January 2024
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                physiotherapy,research,university hospital,profession,genuine physiotherapy research
                Medicine
                physiotherapy, research, university hospital, profession, genuine physiotherapy research

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content140

                Most referenced authors489