8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Risk Factors for Delirium Are Different in the Very Old: A Comparative One-Year Prospective Cohort Study of 5,831 Patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: In an ever-aging society, health care systems will be confronted with an increasing number of patients over 80 years (“the very old”). Currently, knowledge about and recommendations for delirium management are often based on studies in patients aged 60 to 65 years. It is not clear whether these findings apply to patients ≥80 years.

          Aim: Comparison of younger and older patients with delirium, especially regarding risk factors.

          Methods: In this prospective cohort study, within 1-year, 5,831 patients (18–80 years: n = 4,730; ≥80: n = 1,101) with delirium were enrolled. The diagnosis of delirium was based on the Delirium Observation screening scale (DOS), Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) and a DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual)-5 construct of nursing instrument. Sociodemographic trajectories, as well as the relevant predisposing and precipitating factors for delirium, were assessed via a multiple regression analysis.

          Results: The very old were more commonly admitted as emergencies (OR 1.42), had a greater mortality risk (OR 1.56) and displayed fewer precipitating risk factors for the development of a delirium, although the number of diagnoses were not different ( p = 0.325). Predisposing factors were sufficient almost alone for the development of delirium in patients ≥ 80 years of age; in 18–80 years of age, additional precipitating factors had to occur to make a delirium possible.

          Conclusion: When relevant predisposing factors for delirium are apparent, patients over 80 years of age require comparatively few or no precipitating factors to develop delirium. This finding should be taken into account at hospitalization and may allow better treatment of delirium in the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Frailty in elderly people

            Frailty is the most problematic expression of population ageing. It is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homoeostasis after a stressor event and is a consequence of cumulative decline in many physiological systems during a lifetime. This cumulative decline depletes homoeostatic reserves until minor stressor events trigger disproportionate changes in health status. In landmark studies, investigators have developed valid models of frailty and these models have allowed epidemiological investigations that show the association between frailty and adverse health outcomes. We need to develop more efficient methods to detect frailty and measure its severity in routine clinical practice, especially methods that are useful for primary care. Such progress would greatly inform the appropriate selection of elderly people for invasive procedures or drug treatments and would be the basis for a shift in the care of frail elderly people towards more appropriate goal-directed care. Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Delirium in elderly people.

              Delirium is an acute disorder of attention and cognition in elderly people (ie, those aged 65 years or older) that is common, serious, costly, under-recognised, and often fatal. A formal cognitive assessment and history of acute onset of symptoms are necessary for diagnosis. In view of the complex multifactorial causes of delirium, multicomponent non-pharmacological risk factor approaches are the most effective strategy for prevention. No convincing evidence shows that pharmacological prevention or treatment is effective. Drug reduction for sedation and analgesia and non-pharmacological approaches are recommended. Delirium offers opportunities to elucidate brain pathophysiology--it serves both as a marker of brain vulnerability with decreased reserve and as a potential mechanism for permanent cognitive damage. As a potent indicator of patients' safety, delirium provides a target for system-wide process improvements. Public health priorities include improvements in coding, reimbursement from insurers, and research funding, and widespread education for clinicians and the public about the importance of delirium. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychiatry
                Front Psychiatry
                Front. Psychiatry
                Frontiers in Psychiatry
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-0640
                11 May 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 655087
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [2] 2Department of Epileptology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tubingen , Tubingen, Germany
                [3] 3Department of Gastroenterology University Hospital Zürich, University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [4] 4Institute of Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                [5] 5University Hospital Zurich, University Zurich , Zurich, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Shen Li, Tianjin Medical University, China

                Reviewed by: Patricia Tabloski, Boston College, United States; Sandeep Grover, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), India

                *Correspondence: Justus Marquetand Justus.marquetand@ 123456med.uni-tuebingen.de

                This article was submitted to Aging Psychiatry, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyt.2021.655087
                8144286
                b6f9d808-1571-4d5a-879d-f359655d2aee
                Copyright © 2021 Marquetand, Bode, Fuchs, Hildenbrand, Ernst, von Kaenel and Boettger.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 18 January 2021
                : 15 April 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 29, Pages: 9, Words: 4925
                Categories
                Psychiatry
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                delirium,very old,risk factors,comparison,prospective
                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                delirium, very old, risk factors, comparison, prospective

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content344

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors525