22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Contract award criteria in public procurement procedures – The possibility of improving the situation of society from the perspective of the European Union and Poland

      other

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Public tenders are vital for a country’s GDP and citizens’ quality of life, enabling public administration to achieve various goals. Developing and developed countries allocate over 10% of their GDP to public procurement. This highlights the significant societal support public tenders can provide, making it important to consider how they can further benefit society.

          Policy and implications

          Public procurement can achieve policy objectives and benefit society by selecting tenders based on criteria beyond price, such as economic advantage and social benefits. This approach, endorsed by EU directives since 2014, encourages innovation and socially responsible practices. Contracting authorities in the EU can use social, environmental, and qualitative criteria to determine the most advantageous offers.

          Poland’s Public Procurement Law (PPL) allows contract award criteria based on quality and price, including social aspects. Contracting authorities can specify criteria like employing marginalized groups, though these criteria often face scrutiny and legal challenges. Non-price criteria aim to enhance competition and achieve social, environmental, and economic goals.

          Recommendations

          EU and Polish laws permit and encourage using social aspects as contract award criteria in public procurement. However, contracting authorities must analyze priorities, risk balancing, time constraints, and departmental coordination to effectively implement these criteria. This approach can improve the social situation and support specific groups.

          Conclusions

          Public procurement significantly influences a country’s economy and quality of life, with EU and Polish laws allowing social criteria in contract awards. Directive 2014/24/EU supports tenders based on economic and social benefits. Poland’s PPL aligns with this, emphasizing marginalized group employment. Effective implementation fosters job creation, social integration, and improved living standards.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty

          Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal AnalysisRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – Original Draft PreparationRole: Writing – Review & Editing
                Journal
                F1000Res
                F1000Res
                F1000Research
                F1000 Research Limited (London, UK )
                2046-1402
                10 September 2024
                2024
                : 13
                : 832
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Master of Laws (LL.M. and magister), University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland
                [1 ]Turin University, Turin, Italy
                [1 ]Department of Public and Social Policy, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
                Not Applicable, Poland
                [1 ]Turin University, Turin, Italy
                Not Applicable, Poland
                Author notes

                No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: There are no competing interests

                Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

                Competing interests: There are no competing interests

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9586-2490
                Article
                10.12688/f1000research.153917.2
                11425036
                39328392
                b7c32a4b-e4cb-4b97-879e-1bbc4ff9dc11
                Copyright: © 2024 Brzeziński M

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 September 2024
                Funding
                The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.
                Categories
                Policy Brief
                Articles

                public procurement,tenders,contract award criteria,socially responsible public procurement,social aspects

                Comments

                Comment on this article