There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
The value of microbiology and histopathology in the diagnosis of neuropathic foot
osteomyelitis remains poorly understood. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated
the concordance of microbiology and histopathology results from bone resections and
found similar proportions of bacterial growth in samples with and without histopathologic
evidence of osteomyelitis.
It is well established that diabetes mellitus increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality. Observational studies suggest that a history of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) may increase this risk further still. We sought to determine to what extent DFU is associated with excess risk over and above diabetes. We identified studies reporting on associations of DFU with CVD and all-cause mortality. We obtained data on incident events of all-cause mortality, fatal myocardial infarction and fatal stroke. Study-specific estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis and the statistical heterogeneity of included studies was assessed using the I (2) statistic. The eight studies included reported on 3,619 events of all-cause mortality during 81,116 person-years of follow-up. DFU was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.60, 2.23), fatal myocardial infarction (2.22, 95% CI 1.09, 4.53) and fatal stroke (1.41, 95% CI 0.61, 3.24). CVD mortality accounted for a similar proportion of deaths in DFU and non-DFU patients. Patients with DFU have an excess risk of all-cause mortality, compared with patients with diabetes without a history of DFU. This risk is attributable, in part, to a greater burden of CVD. If this result is validated in other studies, strategies should evaluate the role of further aggressive CVD risk modification and ulcer prevention in those with DFU.
We assessed the diagnostic value of swab cultures by comparing them with corresponding cultures of percutaneous bone biopsy specimens for patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The medical charts of patients with foot osteomyelitis who underwent a surgical percutaneous bone biopsy between January 1996 and June 2004 in a single diabetic foot clinic were reviewed. Seventy-six patients with 81 episodes of foot osteomyelitis who had positive results of culture of bone biopsy specimens and who had received no antibiotic therapy for at least 4 weeks before biopsy constituted the study population. Pathogens isolated from bone samples were predominantly staphylococci (52%) and gram-negative bacilli (18.4%). The distributions of microorganisms in bone and swab cultures were similar, except for coagulase-negative staphylococci, which were more prevalent in bone samples (P < .001). The results for cultures of concomitant foot ulcer swabs were available for 69 of 76 patients. The results of bone and swab cultures were identical for 12 (17.4%) of 69 patients, and bone bacteria were isolated from the corresponding swab culture in 21 (30.4%) of 69 patients. The concordance between the results of cultures of swab and of bone biopsy specimens was 42.8% for Staphylococcus aureus, 28.5% for gram-negative bacilli, and 25.8% for streptococci. The overall concordance for all isolates was 22.5%. No adverse events--such as worsening peripheral vascular disease, fracture, or biopsy-induced bone infection--were observed, but 1 patient experienced an episode of acute Charcot osteoarthropathy 4 weeks after bone biopsy was performed. These results suggest that superficial swab cultures do not reliably identify bone bacteria. Percutaneous bone biopsy seems to be safe for patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis.
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Veterans Affairs Portland
Health Care System , Portland, Oregon, USA
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Veterans Affairs Portland
Health Care System , Portland, Oregon, USA
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Veterans Affairs Portland
Health Care System , Portland, Oregon, USA
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Oregon Health & Science University , Portland, Oregon, USA
Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Veterans Affairs Portland
Health Care System , Portland, Oregon, USA
Author notes
Correspondence: Julieta Madrid-Morales, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious
Disease, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road L457,
Portland, OR 97239-3098 (
julietamadrid1992@
123456gmail.com
); Kristina L. Bajema, MD, MSc, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease,
Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR (
Kristina.Bajema@
123456va.gov
); Marissa M. Maier, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, Veterans
Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR (
Marissa.Maier@
123456va.gov
).
Potential conflicts of interest. All authors: No reported conflicts.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any
medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that
the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com
for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained
through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our
site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
History
Date
received
: 27
July
2024
Date: 30
September
2024
Date
accepted
: 03
October
2024
Date: 29
October
2024
Page count
Pages: 3
Categories
Subject:
Infectious Diseases in Special Populations
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.