2,501
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The dynamics of working at intersections: Reflections from exploring inequalities

      research-article
      ,
      Research for All
      UCL Press
      intersectional, inequalities, knowledge exchange, public policy, interdisciplinary

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This commentary provides a first-hand account of a year-long collaborative academic–policy synthesis project – Exploring Inequalities: Igniting Research to Better Inform UK Policy – between University College London (UCL) and the Resolution Foundation. We brought together leading experts from over fifty organizations, convened six roundtables and conducted additional in-depth interviews. This collaboration resulted in a series of action notes and a final report, Structurally Unsound ( Morris et al., 2019). By reflecting on the ‘nuts and bolts’ of doing this type of project, we reveal the hidden realities of knowledge exchange and open up new possibilities for understanding successes and failures for future projects of this kind.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          From invisibility to impact: Recognising the scientific and societal relevance of interdisciplinary sustainability research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Invisible Labor: Hidden Work in the Contemporary World

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Exploring communication processes in workplace meetings: A mixed methods study in a Swedish healthcare organization

              BACKGROUND: An efficient team and a good organizational climate not only improve employee health but also the health and safety of the patients. Building up trust, a good organizational climate and a healthy workplace requires effective communication processes. In Sweden, workplace meetings as settings for communication processes are regulated by a collective labor agreement. However, little is known about how these meetings are organized in which communication processes can be strengthened. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore communication processes during workplace meetings in a Swedish healthcare organization. METHODS: A qualitatively driven, mixed methods design was used with data collected by observations, interviews, focus group interviews and mirroring feedback seminars. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and conventional content analysis. RESULTS: The communication flow and the organization of the observed meetings varied in terms of physical setting, frequency, time allocated and duration. The topics for the workplace meetings were mainly functional with a focus on clinical processes. Overall, the meetings were viewed not only as an opportunity to communicate information top down but also a means by which employees could influence decision-making and development at the workplace. CONCLUSIONS: Workplace meetings have very distinct health-promoting value. It emerged that information and the opportunity to influence decisions related to workplace development are important to the workers. These aspects also affect the outcome of the care provided.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rfa
                Research for All
                UCL Press (UK )
                2399-8121
                21 September 2021
                : 5
                : 2
                : 356-365
                Affiliations
                [1]University College London, UK
                Author notes
                *Corresponding author – email: o.stevenson@ 123456ucl.ac.uk
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-8232
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8758-2207
                Article
                10.14324/RFA.05.2.11
                cf7eccac-e93a-4677-b3ff-1e694172e7fc
                Copyright © 2021 Morris and Stevenson

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 03 September 2020
                : 04 May 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, References: 11, Pages: 11

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Education & Public policy,Educational research & Statistics
                inequalities,public policy,knowledge exchange,intersectional,interdisciplinary

                Comments

                Comment on this article