2,298
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ardagh Community Trust: transgressing boundaries, asserting community

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Administrative boundaries are ubiquitous. A vital technology of power within the modern nation-state’s mode of bureaucratic governance, they carve up and abstract land and water alike into conceptual totalities that, in their simplification, render them legible to centralised administrative bodies. This is a foundational tool of state planning, the impact of which permeates all aspects of socio-economic life. These boundaries are not passive; they do not simply define a geographical area. Rather, they are selective in what they encompass and, as a result, what they include and exclude and what is rendered visible and, hence, valuable. This article describes an example of the real-world impact of this selectivity through discussion of the experiences of a community-led charity (Ardagh Community Trust) and the community group that founded it (Friends of Horfield Common). In their work to demonstrate that an administrative-boundary-spanning public green space (Horfield Common) and leisure facility (the Ardagh) was a vital community resource and hub, this article focuses on the work of Friends of Horfield Common/Ardagh Community Trust to ensure that their local community, one dissected by multiple administrative boundaries, was recognised and acknowledged when, in 2008, Bristol City Council in the UK proposed the sale of multiple publicly owned green spaces through their Parks and Green Space Strategy. Administrative boundaries played a key role in defining and determining which sites in the city were proposed for sale and in structuring the accompanying public consultation process, thereby determining which communities were recognised as communities in relation to this policy and, hence, which communities’ opinions were actively sought and heard. This article concludes by highlighting some of the potential political and economic costs attendant on reifying administrative boundaries rather than lived communities in both planning and consultation processes.

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The Death and Life of Great American Cities

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Two cheers for anarchism

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              ‘About us’

              (2024)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Guest Editor
                Role: Guest Editor
                Journal
                Archit_MPS
                Architecture_MPS
                UCL Press
                2050-9006
                12 July 2023
                : 25
                : 1
                : 3
                Affiliations
                University of Calgary, School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape, Calgary AB, Canada
                [1 ]Ardagh Community Trust, Bristol, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: sam@ 123456theardagh.com
                Article
                Archit_MPS-25-3
                10.14324/111.444.amps.2023v25i1.003
                d033872b-b948-4877-b619-46441a94c985
                © 2023, Sam Thomson and Alex Franklin.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.amps.2023v25i1.003.

                History
                : 30 August 2022
                : 09 May 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 14
                Categories
                Research article
                Custom metadata
                Thomson, S. and Franklin, A. ‘Ardagh Community Trust: transgressing boundaries, asserting community’. Architecture_MPS 25, 1 (2023): 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.amps.2023v25i1.003.

                Sociology,Political science,Political & Social philosophy,Urban studies,Architecture,Communication & Media studies
                Bristol,deprivation,democratic representation,community-led charities,local authorities,administrative boundaries,green spaces

                Comments

                Comment on this article