15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: the role of communication technology use at home.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Employees can have difficulty mentally distancing themselves from work during off-job time due to increasing use of communication technologies (e.g., e-mail, cell phone, etc.). However, psychological detachment from work during nonwork time is important for employee recovery and health. This study examined several antecedents of psychological detachment: work-home segmentation preference, perceived segmentation norm, and the use of communication technology at home. Results indicate that segmentation preference and segmentation norm were positively associated with psychological detachment. Further, technology use at home partially mediated these relationships. Findings indicate that segmenting work and nonwork roles can help employees detach and recover from work demands. In addition, findings show that the segmentation norm within a work group is associated with employee experiences outside of work. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved).

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Occup Health Psychol
          Journal of occupational health psychology
          1939-1307
          1076-8998
          Oct 2011
          : 16
          : 4
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Psychology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403-0232, USA. ypark@bgsu.edu
          Article
          2011-13470-001
          10.1037/a0023594
          21728434
          d2fdcb0d-26bd-4f17-9cbe-8e1217468022
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article