21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Perceptions of People with Dementia and Key Stakeholders Regarding the Use and Impact of the Social Robot MARIO

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          People with dementia often experience loneliness and social isolation. This can result in increased cognitive decline which, in turn, has a negative impact on quality of life. This paper explores the use of the social robot, MARIO, with older people living with dementia as a way of addressing these issues. A descriptive qualitative study was conducted to explore the perceptions and experiences of the use and impact of MARIO. The research took place in the UK, Italy and Ireland. Semi-structured interviews were held in each location with people with dementia ( n = 38), relatives/carers ( n = 28), formal carers ( n = 28) and managers ( n = 13). The data was analyzed using qualitative content analysis. The findings revealed that despite challenges in relation to voice recognition and the practicalities of conducting research involving robots in real-life settings, most participants were positive about MARIO. Through the robot’s user-led design and personalized applications, MARIO provided a point of interest, social activities, and cognitive engagement increased. However, some formal carers and managers voiced concern that robots might replace care staff.

          Related collections

          Most cited references99

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

          Content analysis is a widely used qualitative research technique. Rather than being a single method, current applications of content analysis show three distinct approaches: conventional, directed, or summative. All three approaches are used to interpret meaning from the content of text data and, hence, adhere to the naturalistic paradigm. The major differences among the approaches are coding schemes, origins of codes, and threats to trustworthiness. In conventional content analysis, coding categories are derived directly from the text data. With a directed approach, analysis starts with a theory or relevant research findings as guidance for initial codes. A summative content analysis involves counting and comparisons, usually of keywords or content, followed by the interpretation of the underlying context. The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic

            The kappa statistic is frequently used to test interrater reliability. The importance of rater reliability lies in the fact that it represents the extent to which the data collected in the study are correct representations of the variables measured. Measurement of the extent to which data collectors (raters) assign the same score to the same variable is called interrater reliability. While there have been a variety of methods to measure interrater reliability, traditionally it was measured as percent agreement, calculated as the number of agreement scores divided by the total number of scores. In 1960, Jacob Cohen critiqued use of percent agreement due to its inability to account for chance agreement. He introduced the Cohen’s kappa, developed to account for the possibility that raters actually guess on at least some variables due to uncertainty. Like most correlation statistics, the kappa can range from −1 to +1. While the kappa is one of the most commonly used statistics to test interrater reliability, it has limitations. Judgments about what level of kappa should be acceptable for health research are questioned. Cohen’s suggested interpretation may be too lenient for health related studies because it implies that a score as low as 0.41 might be acceptable. Kappa and percent agreement are compared, and levels for both kappa and percent agreement that should be demanded in healthcare studies are suggested.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Dementia prevention, intervention, and care

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                20 November 2020
                November 2020
                : 17
                : 22
                : 8621
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aras Moyola, NUI, Galway, Ireland; Kathy.murphy@ 123456nuigalway.ie (K.M.); ngallagher@ 123456nuigalway.ie (N.G.); s.whelan7@ 123456nuigalway.ie (S.W.)
                [2 ]College of Engineering and Science, Alice Perry Building, NUI, Galway, Ireland; eva.e.barrett@ 123456nuigalway.ie
                [3 ]UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre, School of Political Science and Sociology, NUI, Galway, Ireland; tanja.kovacic@ 123456nuigalway.ie
                [4 ]Sistemi Informativi, Innovazione e Ricerca, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza. Viale Cappuccini, 1 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo FG, Italy; d.sancarlo@ 123456operapadrepio.it (D.S.); f.ricciardi@ 123456operapadrepio.it (F.R.)
                [5 ]Institut Digital Enabling, Berner Fachhochschule, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland; adamantios.koumpis@ 123456gmail.com
                [6 ]Faculty of Engineering, Macdonald Engineering Building, 817 Sherbrooke Street West, Room 382 Montreal, Montreal, QC H3A 0C3, Canada; adam.santorelli@ 123456mail.mcgill.ca
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5341-597X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9541-6364
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0068-9912
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-7749
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-4619
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9794-6246
                Article
                ijerph-17-08621
                10.3390/ijerph17228621
                7699754
                33233605
                da34cbbd-642d-4bac-9dcc-0a29738e9b03
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 06 October 2020
                : 11 November 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                dementia,alzheimer’s,older adults,social robots,companion robots,mario,qualitative research,quality of care,long-term care

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                50
                8
                86
                0
                Smart Citations
                50
                8
                86
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content240

                Cited by19

                Most referenced authors1,169