20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Significance

          Chickens are the world’s most numerous domestic animal. In order to understand when, where, and how they first became associated with human societies, we critically assessed the domestic status of chicken remains described in >600 sites in 89 countries, and evaluated zoogeographic, morphological, osteometric, stratigraphic, contextual, iconographic, and textual data. Although previous studies have made claims for an early origin of chickens, our results suggest that unambiguous chickens were not present until ∼1650 to 1250 BCE in central Thailand. A correlation between early chickens and the first appearance of rice and millet cultivation suggests that the production and storage of these cereals may have acted as a magnet, thus initiating the chicken domestication process.

          Abstract

          Though chickens are the most numerous and ubiquitous domestic bird, their origins, the circumstances of their initial association with people, and the routes along which they dispersed across the world remain controversial. In order to establish a robust spatial and temporal framework for their origins and dispersal, we assessed archaeological occurrences and the domestic status of chickens from ∼600 sites in 89 countries by combining zoogeographic, morphological, osteometric, stratigraphic, contextual, iconographic, and textual data. Our results suggest that the first unambiguous domestic chicken bones are found at Neolithic Ban Non Wat in central Thailand dated to ∼1650 to 1250 BCE, and that chickens were not domesticated in the Indian Subcontinent. Chickens did not arrive in Central China, South Asia, or Mesopotamia until the late second millennium BCE, and in Ethiopia and Mediterranean Europe by ∼800 BCE. To investigate the circumstances of their initial domestication, we correlated the temporal spread of rice and millet cultivation with the first appearance of chickens within the range of red junglefowl species. Our results suggest that agricultural practices focused on the production and storage of cereal staples served to draw arboreal red junglefowl into the human niche. Thus, the arrival of rice agriculture may have first facilitated the initiation of the chicken domestication process, and then, following their integration within human communities, allowed for their dispersal across the globe.

          Related collections

          Most cited references147

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Evolution of Animal Domestication

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Domestication of Animals

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Between China and South Asia: A Middle Asian corridor of crop dispersal and agricultural innovation in the Bronze Age

              The period from the late third millennium BC to the start of the first millennium AD witnesses the first steps towards food globalization in which a significant number of important crops and animals, independently domesticated within China, India, Africa and West Asia, traversed Central Asia greatly increasing Eurasian agricultural diversity. This paper utilizes an archaeobotanical database (AsCAD), to explore evidence for these crop translocations along southern and northern routes of interaction between east and west. To begin, crop translocations from the Near East across India and Central Asia are examined for wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) from the eighth to the second millennia BC when they reach China. The case of pulses and flax (Linum usitatissimum) that only complete this journey in Han times (206 BC–AD 220), often never fully adopted, is also addressed. The discussion then turns to the Chinese millets, Panicum miliaceum and Setaria italica, peaches (Amygdalus persica) and apricots (Armeniaca vulgaris), tracing their movement from the fifth millennium to the second millennium BC when the Panicum miliaceum reaches Europe and Setaria italica Northern India, with peaches and apricots present in Kashmir and Swat. Finally, the translocation of japonica rice from China to India that gave rise to indica rice is considered, possibly dating to the second millennium BC. The routes these crops travelled include those to the north via the Inner Asia Mountain Corridor, across Middle Asia, where there is good evidence for wheat, barley and the Chinese millets. The case for japonica rice, apricots and peaches is less clear, and the northern route is contrasted with that through northeast India, Tibet and west China. Not all these journeys were synchronous, and this paper highlights the selective long-distance transport of crops as an alternative to demic-diffusion of farmers with a defined crop package.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
                PNAS
                Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
                National Academy of Sciences
                0027-8424
                1091-6490
                6 June 2022
                14 June 2022
                6 June 2022
                : 119
                : 24
                : e2121978119
                Affiliations
                [1] aArchaeoBioCenter and Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research, and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich , 80539 Munich, Germany;
                [2] bBavarian Natural History Collections, State Collection of Palaeoanatomy Munich (SPM) , 80333 Munich, Germany;
                [3] cCentre for Anthropobiology and Genomics of Toulouse, CNRS UMR 5288, Université de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier , 31000 Toulouse, France;
                [4] dPalaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford , Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom;
                [5] eInstituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano , Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C1426BJN, Argentina;
                [6] fLundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen , 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark;
                [7] gDepartment of Archaeology and Anthropology, Bournemouth University , Poole BH12 5BB, United Kingdom;
                [8] hSchool of History, Archaeology, and Religion, Cardiff University , Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom;
                [9] iDepartment of Archaeology, University of Exeter , Exeter EX4 4PY, United Kingdom;
                [10] jArchéozoologie, Archéobotanique: Sociétés, Pratiques et Environnements, Bases de Données sur la Biodiversité, Écologie, Environnement, et Sociétés, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS , 75005 Paris, France;
                [11] kArchéologie des Sociétés Méditerranéennes, UMR 5140, Université Paul-Valéry, CNRS, LabEx Archimede IA-ANR11-LABX-0032-01 , 34090 Montpellier, France;
                [12] lState Office for Cultural Heritage Baden-Wuerttemberg , 78467 Constance, Germany;
                [13] mPalaeogenomics Group, Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research, and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maximilian University , 80539 Munich, Germany;
                [14] nSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London , London E1 4DQ, United Kingdom;
                [15] oInstitute of Archaeology, University College London , London WC1H 0PY, United Kingdom;
                [16] pSchool of Cultural Heritage, Northwest University , 710069 Xi’an, China
                Author notes

                Edited by Fiona Marshall, Washington University in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO; received December 13, 2021; accepted March 8, 2022

                Author contributions: J.P., E.K.I.-P., and G.L. designed research; J.P., O.L., E.I-.P., P.D.P., J.B., R.S., C.C., A.G., S.T., L.F., N.S., D.Q.F., and G.L. performed research; J.P. analyzed data; and J.P., O.L., E.I-.P., P.D.P., J.B., R.S., C.C., A.G., S.T., L.F., N.S., D.Q.F., and G.L. wrote the paper.

                1J.P. and O.L. contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0894-2628
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0687-8538
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7716-472X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8943-5427
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6514-4457
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8540-8114
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8030-3885
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4859-080X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4092-0392
                Article
                202121978
                10.1073/pnas.2121978119
                9214543
                35666876
                e3842337-3df6-49d8-87d9-b5b77a892d07
                Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

                This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

                History
                : 08 March 2022
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Categories
                402
                402
                Social Sciences
                Anthropology
                Biological Sciences
                Anthropology

                domestication,chickens,dispersal,human niche
                domestication, chickens, dispersal, human niche

                Comments

                Comment on this article