32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Antecedents and Moderation Effects of Maladaptive Coping Behaviors Among German University Students

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prolonging working hours and presenteeism have been conceptualized as self-endangering coping behaviors in employees, which are related to health impairment. Drawing upon the self-regulation of behavior model, the goal achievement process, and Warr's vitamin model, we examined the antecedents and moderation effects regarding quantitative demands, autonomy, emotion regulation, and self-motivation competence of university students' self-endangering coping behaviors (showing prolonging working hours and presenteeism). Results from a cross-sectional survey of 3,546 German university students indicate that quantitative demands are positively related and autonomy has a u-shape connection with self-endangering coping. Emotion regulation was shown to be a protective factor for prolonging working hours. Moreover, self-motivation moderated the relationship between quantitative demands and prolonging of working hours, but not in the assumed direction. Self-motivation showed a systematic positive relationship with prolonging of working hours, but no relationship with presenteeism. Autonomy moderated the relationship of quantitative demands with both self-endangering behaviors. We found no moderating effects for emotion regulation of quantitative demands or autonomy and self-endangering behaviors. Besides further practical implications, the results suggest that lecturers should design their courses accordingly with less time pressure and university students should be trained in the use of autonomy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

          Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The job demands-resources model of burnout.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                07 May 2021
                2021
                : 12
                : 645087
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Work, Organizational and Business Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [2] 2Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Medical School Hamburg , Hamburg, Germany
                [3] 3Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [4] 4Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Centre of the University of Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [5] 5Department of Communication, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [6] 6Department Sport Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , Mainz, Germany
                [7] 7Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research , Mainz, Germany
                Author notes

                Edited by: Raquel Gilar-Corbi, University of Alicante, Spain

                Reviewed by: María del Mar Molero, University of Almeria, Spain; Javier Cejudo, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain

                *Correspondence: Lina Marie Mülder lmuelder@ 123456uni-mainz.de

                This article was submitted to Educational Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645087
                8139516
                34025514
                e5bb2180-cfb0-4200-845b-b6cd26ea9ed5
                Copyright © 2021 Mülder, Deci, Werner, Reichel, Tibubos, Heller, Schäfer, Pfirrmann, Edelmann, Dietz, Beutel, Letzel and Rigotti.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 04 January 2021
                : 22 March 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 62, Pages: 13, Words: 9917
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                university students,stress,self-endangering behavior,quantitative demands,autonomy,presenteeism,emotion regulation,self-motivation

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content141

                Cited by5

                Most referenced authors690