8,668
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    2
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bringing research alive through stories: reflecting on research storytelling as a public engagement method

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Stories are vital in making sense of our lives – and research. Consequently, 12 researchers from the University of Sheffield underwent a three-month training process from September to November 2019 to learn how to shape their research experiences into accessible, ten-minute, spoken stories. This culminated in a storytelling evening as part of the Economic and Social Research Council’s Festival of Social Science, at which researchers from different disciplines discussed various nature–society dynamics in diverse field sites in the Global South. By reflecting on the training process and the performance through qualitative interviews with storytellers and audience members, our study answers the research question: What lessons emerge from an interdisciplinary group of researchers engaging with research storytelling for public engagement? Our study addresses gaps in the literature by focusing on interdisciplinary research storytelling, spoken ten-minute stories, bringing together storytellers’ and audience’s viewpoints, and providing practical recommendations for researchers and practitioners. We argue that research storytelling can have diverse benefits for both researchers and listeners by promoting learning in an accessible format, boosting self-confidence and helping (un/re)learn scholarly communication. However, professional guidance and peer support, as well as ethical sensitivity, are crucial.

          Most cited references60

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives.

          Transportation was proposed as a mechanism whereby narratives can affect beliefs. Defined as absorption into a story, transportation entails imagery, affect, and attentional focus. A transportation scale was developed and validated. Experiment 1 (N = 97) demonstrated that extent of transportation augmented story-consistent beliefs and favorable evaluations of protagonists. Experiment 2 (N = 69) showed that highly transported readers found fewer false notes in a story than less-transported readers. Experiments 3 (N = 274) and 4 (N = 258) again replicated the effects of transportation on beliefs and evaluations; in the latter study, transportation was directly manipulated by using processing instructions. Reduced transportation led to reduced story-consistent beliefs and evaluations. The studies also showed that transportation and corresponding beliefs were generally unaffected by labeling a story as fact or as fiction.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences.

            Although storytelling often has negative connotations within science, narrative formats of communication should not be disregarded when communicating science to nonexpert audiences. Narratives offer increased comprehension, interest, and engagement. Nonexperts get most of their science information from mass media content, which is itself already biased toward narrative formats. Narratives are also intrinsically persuasive, which offers science communicators tactics for persuading otherwise resistant audiences, although such use also raises ethical considerations. Future intersections of narrative research with ongoing discussions in science communication are introduced.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Narrative versus Non-narrative: The Role of Identification, Transportation and Emotion in Reducing Health Disparities.

              This research empirically tests whether using a fictional narrative produces a greater impact on health-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intention than presenting the identical information in a more traditional, nonfiction, non-narrative format. European American, Mexican American, and African American women (N = 758) were surveyed before and after viewing either a narrative or non-narrative cervical cancer-related film. The narrative was more effective in increasing cervical cancer-related knowledge and attitudes. Moreover, in response to the narrative featuring Latinas, Mexican Americans were most transported, identified most with the characters, and experienced the strongest emotions. Regressions revealed that transportation, identification with specific characters, and emotion each contributed to shifts in knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions. Thus, narrative formats may provide a valuable tool in reducing health disparities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rfa
                Research for All
                UCL Press (UK )
                2399-8121
                20 September 2022
                : 6
                : 1
                : 20
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Sheffield, UK
                [2 ]Lancaster University, UK
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4593-0781
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7675-8825
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0122-2484
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3785-8057
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4208-1211
                Article
                10.14324/RFA.06.1.20
                e8144123-9821-4011-9627-581ee724ef37
                Copyright 2022, Judith E. Krauss, Suma Mani, Jonas Cromwell, Itzel San Roman Pineda and Frances Cleaver

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 19 March 2021
                : 27 June 2022
                Page count
                Tables: 1, References: 60, Pages: 16
                Categories
                Article

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Education & Public policy,Educational research & Statistics
                Global South,public engagement,research storytelling,interdisciplinarity

                Comments

                Comment on this article