11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Identifying the determinants of patient satisfaction in the context of antenatal care in Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi using service provision assessment data

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Antenatal care (ANC) is a service that can reduce the incidence of maternal and neonatal deaths when provided by skilled healthcare workers. Patient satisfaction is an important health system responsiveness goal which has been shown to influence adherence to healthcare interventions. This study aims to assess the determinants of pregnant women’s satisfaction with ANC across Kenya, Tanzania, and Malawi using nationally representative Service Provision Assessment data.

          Methods

          Patient satisfaction was conceptualised mainly based on Donabedian’s theory of healthcare quality with patient characteristics, structure, and process as the major determinants. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the potential determinants.

          Results

          Findings show that satisfaction was negatively associated with women’s age (AOR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.92–0.99) and having a secondary (AOR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.17–0.87) or tertiary education (AOR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17–0.99) in Kenya. Women on their first pregnancy were more likely to report satisfaction in Tanzania (AOR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.00–2.62) while women were less likely to report being satisfied in their second trimester in Malawi (AOR: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.09–0.97). The important structural and process factors for patient satisfaction included: private versus public run facilities in Kenya (AOR: 2.05; 95% CI: 1.22–3.43) and Malawi (AOR: 1.85; 95% CI: 0.99–3.43); level of provider training, that is, specialist versus enrolled nurse in Tanzania (AOR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.13–0.93) or clinical technician in Malawi (AOR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.01–0.36); and shorter waiting times across all countries.

          Conclusion

          Findings highlight the importance of professional proficiency and efficient service delivery in determining pregnant women’s satisfaction with ANC. Future studies should incorporate both patient characteristics and institutional factors at health facilities into their conceptualisation of patient satisfaction.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-08085-0.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Quality of Care

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review.

            A large number of studies have addressed the detection of patient satisfaction determinants, and the results are still inconclusive. Furthermore, it is known that contradicting evidence exists across patient satisfaction studies. This article is the second part of a two-part series of research with a goal to review a current conceptual framework of patient satisfaction for further operationalisation procedures. The aim of this work was to systematically identify and review evidence regarding determinants of patient satisfaction between 1980 and 2014, and to seek the reasons for contradicting results in relationships between determinants and patient satisfaction in the literature to design a further robust measurement system for patient satisfaction.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Patient satisfaction: a valid concept?

              Over the past 10 yr consumer satisfaction has gained widespread recognition as a measure of quality in many public sector services. This has become manifest in the NHS in the call by the 1983 NHS Management inquiry to ascertain how well the service is being delivered at local level by obtaining the experience and perceptions of patients and the community. Patient satisfaction is now deemed an important outcome measure for health services; however, this professed utility rests on a number of implicit assumptions about the nature and meaning of expressions of 'satisfaction'. Through a review of past research findings this paper suggests that patients may have a complex set of important and relevant beliefs which cannot be embodied in terms of expressions of satisfaction. Consequently, many satisfaction surveys provide only an illusion of consumerism producing results which tend only to endorse the status quo. For service providers to meaningfully ascertain the experience and perceptions of patients and the community then research must first be conducted to identify the ways and terms in which those patients perceive and evaluate that service.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                katebergh@outlook.com
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                4 June 2022
                4 June 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 746
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.7445.2, ISNI 0000 0001 2113 8111, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, Medical School Building, St Mary’s Hospital, ; Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.34477.33, ISNI 0000000122986657, Evans School of Public Policy and Governance, , University of Washington Seattle, University of Washington, ; Box 353055, Seattle, WA 98195-3055 USA
                Article
                8085
                10.1186/s12913-022-08085-0
                9167501
                35658949
                e9e90c1e-38ec-481e-aa43-d704e12e70aa
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 10 January 2022
                : 10 May 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000867, Commonwealth Scholarship Commission;
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Health & Social care
                patient satisfaction,quality of care,antenatal care,women’s health,sub-saharan africa

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content223

                Cited by4

                Most referenced authors247