24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Epistemic Beliefs and Pre-service Teachers’ Conceptions of History Instruction

      , ,
      Frontiers in Education
      Frontiers Media SA

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study investigates the difficulties pre-service history teachers face in understanding and implementing a history curriculum focused on historical reasoning. Based on the general hypothesis of beliefs exerting a direct influence on teachers’ actions, this phenomenographic study provides a qualitative analysis of the epistemic and learning/teaching conceptions on which pre-service teachers base their reflections and decisions when they have to produce a teaching plan for a specific situation, taking n = 72 pre-service teachers from the Master’s Degree in Teaching in Secondary Education at the University of Zaragoza (specialty Geography and History) as statistical sample. The outcome of the first phases of the analysis was a new theoretical reference framework that innovated by simultaneously analyzing epistemic and educational conceptions. On the one hand, the analysis results include a considerable number of pre-service teachers who use epistemic beliefs identifying history and the past when addressing the curriculum. On the other, none of them, not even those with advanced epistemic beliefs, think about the curriculum in terms of an inquiry-based approach to historical problems, and, therefore, they display a transmissive–reproductive conception of history instruction. Consequently, the main contribution is observation of a twofold threshold that pre-service teachers must cross to understand and accept an interpretive history curriculum: they must overcome the identification between past and history and instead immerse themselves in the necessarily interpretive nature of any history; and they must stop viewing learning as knowledge internalization and reproduction and, instead, embrace a conception of learning as inquiry and reasoning.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I-OUTCOME AND PROCESS*

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Teachers' Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              The skills of argument

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Frontiers in Education
                Front. Educ.
                Frontiers Media SA
                2504-284X
                April 13 2022
                April 13 2022
                : 7
                Article
                10.3389/feduc.2022.865222
                f0fa818a-437c-4c02-91b1-7da15111916f
                © 2022

                Free to read

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article