Resumen: Este texto a dos manos integra en un solo espacio el debate que sostuvieron dos figuras académicas indiscutibles, Georges Didi-Huberman, historiador del arte, y Enzo Traverso, historiador, en el diario digital francés AOC [Analyse Opinion Critique],1 entre los meses de mayo y octubre de 2022. En un intercambio epistolar público, Didi-Huberman comienza la discusión sobre un breve comentario que Traverso incluye en su libro Revolution. An Intellectual History (2021), que hacía alusión a una imagen problemática del fotógrafo Gilles Caron -tomada durante las manifestaciones anticatólicas en Irlanda del Norte en 1969-, parte de Soulèvements, una exposición que Didi-Huberman curó para el Museo Jeu de Paume de París entre 2016 y 2017. A partir de este punto, el debate entre ambos intelectuales se extenderá a una de las más interesantes reflexiones, que muestra dos posiciones sobre los modos de ver la imagen y su relación con la historia.
Abstract: This two-handed text integrates in a single space the debate held by two indisputable academic figures, Georges Didi-Huberman, art historian, and Enzo Traverso, historian, in the French digital daily news AOC [Analyse Opinion Critique], between the months of May and October 2022. In a public exchange of letters, Didi-Huberman begins the discussion on a brief comment that Traverso includes in his book Revolution. An Intellectual History (2021), which alluded to a problematic image by photographer Gilles Caron -taken during the anti-Catholic demonstrations in Northern Ireland in 1969-, part of Soulèvements, an exhibition that Didi-Huberman curated for the Jeu de Paume Museum in Paris between 2016 and 2017. From this point, the debate between the two intellectuals will extend to one of the most interesting reflections, which shows two positions on the ways of seeing the image and its relationship to history.
See how this article has been cited at scite.ai
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.