10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Investigating Indirect and Direct Reputation Formation in Asian Elephants ( Elephas maximus)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Reputation is a key component in social interactions of group-living animals and appears to play a role in the establishment of cooperation. Animals can form a reputation of an individual by directly interacting with them or by observing them interact with a third party, i.e., eavesdropping. Elephants are an interesting taxon in which to investigate eavesdropping as they are highly cooperative, large-brained, long-lived terrestrial mammals with a complex social organisation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether captive Asian elephants ( Elephas maximus) could form reputations of humans through indirect and/or direct experience in two different paradigms: (1) a cooperative string-pulling task and (2) a scenario requiring begging. Fourteen captive Asian elephants in Thailand participated in an experimental procedure that consisted of three parts: baseline, observation, and testing. In the observation phase, the subject saw a conspecific interact with two people—one cooperative/generous and one non-cooperative/selfish. The observer could then choose which person to approach in the test phase. The elephants were tested in a second session 2–5 days later. We found no support for the hypothesis that elephants can form reputations of humans through indirect or direct experience, but these results may be due to challenges with experimental design rather than a lack of capacity. We discuss how the results may be due to a potential lack of ecological validity in this study and the difficulty of assessing motivation and attentiveness in elephants. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of designing future experiments that account for the elephants' use of multimodal sensory information in their decision-making.

          Related collections

          Most cited references50

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Usinglme4

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

            Linear mixed-effects models (LMEMs) have become increasingly prominent in psycholinguistics and related areas. However, many researchers do not seem to appreciate how random effects structures affect the generalizability of an analysis. Here, we argue that researchers using LMEMs for confirmatory hypothesis testing should minimally adhere to the standards that have been in place for many decades. Through theoretical arguments and Monte Carlo simulation, we show that LMEMs generalize best when they include the maximal random effects structure justified by the design. The generalization performance of LMEMs including data-driven random effects structures strongly depends upon modeling criteria and sample size, yielding reasonable results on moderately-sized samples when conservative criteria are used, but with little or no power advantage over maximal models. Finally, random-intercepts-only LMEMs used on within-subjects and/or within-items data from populations where subjects and/or items vary in their sensitivity to experimental manipulations always generalize worse than separate F 1 and F 2 tests, and in many cases, even worse than F 1 alone. Maximal LMEMs should be the 'gold standard' for confirmatory hypothesis testing in psycholinguistics and beyond.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Generalized Linear Models

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                08 January 2021
                2020
                : 11
                : 604372
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Domestication Lab, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna , Vienna, Austria
                [2] 2Department for Psychotherapy and Biopsychosocial Health, Danube University Krems , Krems, Austria
                [3] 3Department of Psychology, Hunter College, City University of New York , New York, NY, United States
                [4] 4Department of Psychology, The Graduate Center, City University of New York , New York, NY, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Nathan J. Emery, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Sonja Elena Koski, University of Helsinki, Finland; Christina Alligood, University of Florida, United States

                *Correspondence: Hoi-Lam Jim hoi-lam.jim@ 123456vetmeduni.ac.at

                This article was submitted to Comparative Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604372
                7841644
                33519611
                f4b6fb4f-a1d2-4863-af9a-67d6a03eb279
                Copyright © 2021 Jim, Range, Marshall-Pescini, Dale and Plotnik.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 09 September 2020
                : 17 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 6, Equations: 0, References: 51, Pages: 19, Words: 15243
                Funding
                Funded by: Austrian Science Fund 10.13039/501100002428
                Award ID: W1262-B29
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                eavesdropping,third-party evaluation,image scoring,social evaluation,third-party interactions,human-animal interactions,string-pulling,elephant cognition

                Comments

                Comment on this article