61
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pathways to Science and Engineering Bachelor’s Degrees for Men and Women

      research-article
      a , b
      Sociological science
      gender, education, STEM fields

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Despite the striking reversal of the gender gap in educational attainment and the near–gender parity in math performance, women pursue science and engineering (S/E) degrees at much lower rates than their male peers do. Current efforts to increase the number of women in these fields focus on different life-course periods but lack a clear understanding of the importance of these periods and how orientations toward S/E fields develop over time. In this article, we examine the gendered pathways to a S/E bachelor’s degree from middle school to high school and college based on a representative sample from the 1973 to 1974 birth cohort. Using a counterfactual decomposition analysis, we determine the relative importance of these different life-course periods and thereby inform the direction of future research and policy. Our findings confirm previous research that highlights the importance of early encouragement for gender differences in S/E degrees, but our findings also attest to the high school years as a decisive period for the gender gap, while challenging the focus on college in research and policy. Indeed, if female high school seniors had the same orientation toward and preparation for S/E fields as their male peers, the gender gap in S/E degrees would be closed by as much as 82 percent.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science

          Explanations for women's underrepresentation in math-intensive fields of science often focus on sex discrimination in grant and manuscript reviewing, interviewing, and hiring. Claims that women scientists suffer discrimination in these arenas rest on a set of studies undergirding policies and programs aimed at remediation. More recent and robust empiricism, however, fails to support assertions of discrimination in these domains. To better understand women's underrepresentation in math-intensive fields and its causes, we reprise claims of discrimination and their evidentiary bases. Based on a review of the past 20 y of data, we suggest that some of these claims are no longer valid and, if uncritically accepted as current causes of women's lack of progress, can delay or prevent understanding of contemporary determinants of women's underrepresentation. We conclude that differential gendered outcomes in the real world result from differences in resources attributable to choices, whether free or constrained, and that such choices could be influenced and better informed through education if resources were so directed. Thus, the ongoing focus on sex discrimination in reviewing, interviewing, and hiring represents costly, misplaced effort: Society is engaged in the present in solving problems of the past, rather than in addressing meaningful limitations deterring women's participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers today. Addressing today's causes of underrepresentation requires focusing on education and policy changes that will make institutions responsive to differing biological realities of the sexes. Finally, we suggest potential avenues of intervention to increase gender fairness that accord with current, as opposed to historical, findings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Diversity. Gender similarities characterize math performance.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The Growing Female Advantage in College Completion: The Role of Family Background and Academic Achievement

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                101633873
                42661
                Sociol Sci
                Sociol Sci
                Sociological science
                2330-6696
                10 June 2014
                18 February 2014
                31 July 2014
                : 1
                : 41-48
                Affiliations
                [a ]Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
                [b ]Department of Sociology, Columbia University
                Author notes
                Address correspondence to Joscha Legewie
                Article
                NIHMS583664
                10.15195/v1.a4
                4116814
                25089284
                f5614595-a2c7-4101-90c7-b6f6d54540bf
                Copyright: © 2014 Legewie and DiPrete.

                This open-access article has been published and distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction, in any form, as long as the original author and source have been credited.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                gender,education,stem fields
                gender, education, stem fields

                Comments

                Comment on this article